MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2906992888 · doi:10.1353/esp.2018.0054

Kerouac: Language, Poetics, and Territory by Hassan Melehy

2018· article· fr· W2906992888 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Annie de Saussure

Bibliographic record

Venue˜L'œesprit créateur/˜L'œEsprit créateur · 2018
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicPoetry Analysis and Criticism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoeticsFAUSTLiteratureFrenchArtHistoryAmerican literatureArt historyPoetryHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Kerouac: Language, Poetics, and Territory by Hassan Melehy Annie de Saussure Hassan Melehy. Kerouac: Language, Poetics, and Territory. New York: Bloomsbury Academic, 2016. Pp. xiii + 255. $120.00. Hassan Melehy’s groundbreaking study begins with a simple yet overlooked fact—Kerouac, originally from the French-Canadian community of Lowell, Massachusetts, was a native Fran-cophone speaker. The author reintroduces his readers to Kerouac as not only an astute reader and craftsman of literature, but also a transcultural author whose work explores tensions between roots and travel, settlement and motion, home and the road. Kerouac, Melehy argues, has yet to receive full and due credit for his contribution to literature. His writing demonstrates critical engagement with the Western canon, a testament to his brief time as a student at Columbia. In Dr. Sax: Faust Part Three (Chapter 4), Kerouac expands on Goethe’s legend by setting it in his Massachusetts hometown. The narrator’s Francophone community, Melehy argues, is paradoxically unsettled—exiled both culturally and linguistically in Anglophone New England. Connecting with his cultural heritage, Kerouac also turned to French sources of literary inspiration. In Satori in Paris (Chapter 5), scenes of drunkenness and bodily pleasures, Melehy argues, serve a Rabelaisian function by leveling socio-economic and national distinctions and imagining a utopian, equalizing space of cultural exchange. Disagreeing with the characterization of Kerouac’s work as un-literary or sloppy, Melehy analyzes the author’s honed techniques such as spontaneous prose, automatic writing, and sketching (Chapter 3). Though the Beat author’s fascination with jazz, as the term Beat itself suggests, has been criticized for appropriating African-American culture, Melehy focuses instead on how Kerouac’s use of jazz shaped the mechanics of his poetics, notably in Visions of Cody. In The Town and The City and On the Road, the narrators’ journeys, Melehy shows, convey a sense of exile and dispossession that is rooted in Québécois cultural survivance (Chapters 1–2). Kerouac’s native French informs his literary experimentation in English as he expresses cultural otherness by destabilizing the English language itself. This linguistic experimentation ties to Kerouac’s [End Page 169] understanding of travel, and even writing itself, as an experience that creates new cultural connections, challenges fixed notions of identity, and reveals the inherent, though often hidden, diversity of America. Melehy convincingly explores Kerouac’s “off-whiteness,” or how his otherness challenges American racial boundaries. Readers, however, may still take issue with Melehy’s argument that Sal Paradise’s problematic identification with African-Americans and Latinos in On the Road is a denunciation of the limits of whiteness and white society that seeks to permeate and transcend those racial borders. Finally, the author of this study misses an opportunity to analyze more deeply the thematics of exile and cultural alienation in Satori in Paris in which the narrator searches for his ancestral ‘home’ in Brittany. Addressing the parallels between Québécois and Breton cultures, both marginalized and exiled in their own right, would offer another key iteration of Kerouac’s poetics of territory and exile. Melehy’s work is a timely and vital contribution not just to Beat Generation scholarship, but also to Francophone studies more broadly as the field tends toward inscribing Francophone Literatures in global and transnational paradigms. Annie de Saussure Lafayette College Copyright © 2018 L’Esprit Créateur

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.078

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.003
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0230.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue˜L'œesprit créateur/˜L'œEsprit créateurSame topicPoetry Analysis and CriticismFrench-language works237,207