MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2907883664 · doi:10.1182/blood-2018-99-117333

Obinutuzumab Plus Gemcitabine, Dexamethasone and Cisplatin (O-GDP) As Salvage Chemotherapy Prior to Autologous Stem Cell Transplant in Aggressive B Cell Lymphoma

2018· article· en· W2907883664 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Michael D. Jain, Ryan D. Morin, Anca Prica, Vishal Kukreti, Robert Kridel, Rob C. Laister, Meng Li, Christopher Rushton, Miguel Alcaide, Rashmi S. Goswami, Jan Delabie, Jessica Weiss, Tony Panzarella, Michael Crump, David W. Scott, John Kuruvilla

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2018
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueCAR-T cell therapy research
Établissements canadiensHealth Sciences CentreSunnybrook Health Science CentreUniversity Health NetworkUniversity of TorontoBC Cancer AgencySimon Fraser UniversityPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésObinutuzumabMedicineRituximabInternal medicineOncologySalvage therapyFollicular lymphomaGemcitabineChemotherapy regimenAutologous stem-cell transplantationRegimenAggressive lymphomaLymphomaChemotherapySurgery

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Background: The LY.12 randomized phase 3 clinical trial defined gemcitabine, dexamethasone and cisplatin (GDP) as an effective outpatient salvage chemotherapy regimen in relapsed/refractory (R/R) patients with aggressive lymphomas who are candidates for autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) (Crump et al. JCO 2014). When the anti-CD20 antibody rituximab (R) was added to GDP, the ORR was 45.6% by CT imaging and 51.9% of patients were able to receive ASCT. Obinutuzumab (O) is a type 2 CD20 antibody that has demonstrated superiority to R in some studies in indolent lymphomas and is active in R-refractory follicular lymphoma. Improvements in the outcome of salvage therapy have tested alternative CD20 antibodies (Van Imhoff, JCO 2017), to date without success. We report a single centre, single arm clinical trial of O-GDP to assess safety and efficacy in R/R aggressive B cell lymphoma. Methods: Transplant eligible patients with DLBCL and transformed indolent lymphoma were treated with O-GDP for two cycles, followed by response assessment by CT. Non-progressors received a third cycle of O-GDP for stem cell mobilization and a PET/CT scan was obtained after stem cell collection. Responders then proceeded to ASCT per investigator decision. O was given at 1000 mg weekly during the first cycle of GDP and then on day 1 of cycles 2 and 3. Responses were determined by Lugano criteria using investigator assessment. The primary outcome was ORR by CT imaging after 2 cycles. The pre-specified statistical analysis stated that the trial will be declared positive if the ORR was >60%, negative if the ORR was <40% and indeterminate if in-between. Secondary outcomes included PET CR rate after 3 cycles of O-GDP and the rate of proceeding to ASCT. Exploratory outcomes included measurements of circulating tumor (ct) DNA during protocol therapy, and analysis of individual mutations. Results: The trial has completed its planned accrual of 30 patients. Median age was 59.5 (range 30 - 70), with 40% female, 70% with DLBCL NOS and 30% with transformed indolent lymphoma (all but one patient having transformed follicular lymphoma). IPI at study entry was 0-1 (20% of patients), 2 (30%) or 3+ (50%). Grade 3 or 4 toxicity was observed in 87% of patients. This was mainly myelosuppression with grade 4 neutropenia (47%) and thrombocytopenia (37%). Other grade 4 adverse events were sepsis (2 patients), febrile neutropenia (1 patient) and hypokalemia (1 patient). No grade 5 events were attributed to study treatment. One additional case of myelodysplastic syndrome caused treatment discontinuation. Events necessitating dose reductions (33% of patients), dose delays (23%) and dose holds (23%) occurred in a total of 57% of patients. At the time of submission, data are evaluable for the primary endpoint in 28 patients. The ORR (CR + PR) by CT imaging after 2 cycles of study therapy was 60.7% (95% CI 40.6-78.5) Overall, 65.5% of patients (95%CI = 45.7%-82.1%) proceeded to ASCT. In addition, 15 patients are evaluable by PET/CT after 3 cycles of O-GDP, with 47% attaining a complete metabolic response (Deauville 1 - 3), 40% a partial metabolic response and 13% with no metabolic response by Lugano criteria. Plasma ctDNA measurements were taken at baseline, after 1 cycle of O-GDP, and at the time of PET/CT. CtDNA quantities will be compared to imaging assessments. Conclusions: O-GDP is an outpatient salvage regimen that enables ASCT in patients with R/R DLBCL. Compared to R-GDP there is a greater frequency of grade 3 - 4 toxicity (O-GDP 87%, R-GDP previously reported at 47%), although the difference is mainly due to cytopenias and can be managed by dose adjustments to the GDP regimen. Further data analysis is required to determine if the trial will meet the primary endpoint of an ORR > 60%. The overall rate of proceeding to ASCT with O-GDP salvage in this trial was 65.5% compared to that previously reported for R-GDP at 51.9%. Disclosures Scott: NanoString: Patents & Royalties: Named Inventor on a patent licensed to NanoString Technologies, Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria. Kuruvilla:BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; Abbvie: Consultancy; Leukemia and Lymphoma Society Canada: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Karyopharm: Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Princess Margaret Cancer Foundation: Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria; Lundbeck: Honoraria; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Essai non randomisé · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,001
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,005

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,014
Tête enseignante GPT0,273
Écart entre enseignants0,259 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeEssai non randomisé
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2018
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBlood→Même sujetCAR-T cell therapy research→Travaux en français237 207→