MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2907883664 · doi:10.1182/blood-2018-99-117333

Obinutuzumab Plus Gemcitabine, Dexamethasone and Cisplatin (O-GDP) As Salvage Chemotherapy Prior to Autologous Stem Cell Transplant in Aggressive B Cell Lymphoma

2018· article· en· W2907883664 on OpenAlexaffabout
Michael D. Jain, Ryan D. Morin, Anca Prica, Vishal Kukreti, Robert Kridel, Rob C. Laister, Meng Li, Christopher Rushton, Miguel Alcaide, Rashmi S. Goswami, Jan Delabie, Jessica Weiss, Tony Panzarella, Michael Crump, David W. Scott, John Kuruvilla

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCAR-T cell therapy research
Canadian institutionsHealth Sciences CentreSunnybrook Health Science CentreUniversity Health NetworkUniversity of TorontoBC Cancer AgencySimon Fraser UniversityPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsObinutuzumabMedicineRituximabInternal medicineOncologySalvage therapyFollicular lymphomaGemcitabineChemotherapy regimenAutologous stem-cell transplantationRegimenAggressive lymphomaLymphomaChemotherapySurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: The LY.12 randomized phase 3 clinical trial defined gemcitabine, dexamethasone and cisplatin (GDP) as an effective outpatient salvage chemotherapy regimen in relapsed/refractory (R/R) patients with aggressive lymphomas who are candidates for autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) (Crump et al. JCO 2014). When the anti-CD20 antibody rituximab (R) was added to GDP, the ORR was 45.6% by CT imaging and 51.9% of patients were able to receive ASCT. Obinutuzumab (O) is a type 2 CD20 antibody that has demonstrated superiority to R in some studies in indolent lymphomas and is active in R-refractory follicular lymphoma. Improvements in the outcome of salvage therapy have tested alternative CD20 antibodies (Van Imhoff, JCO 2017), to date without success. We report a single centre, single arm clinical trial of O-GDP to assess safety and efficacy in R/R aggressive B cell lymphoma. Methods: Transplant eligible patients with DLBCL and transformed indolent lymphoma were treated with O-GDP for two cycles, followed by response assessment by CT. Non-progressors received a third cycle of O-GDP for stem cell mobilization and a PET/CT scan was obtained after stem cell collection. Responders then proceeded to ASCT per investigator decision. O was given at 1000 mg weekly during the first cycle of GDP and then on day 1 of cycles 2 and 3. Responses were determined by Lugano criteria using investigator assessment. The primary outcome was ORR by CT imaging after 2 cycles. The pre-specified statistical analysis stated that the trial will be declared positive if the ORR was >60%, negative if the ORR was <40% and indeterminate if in-between. Secondary outcomes included PET CR rate after 3 cycles of O-GDP and the rate of proceeding to ASCT. Exploratory outcomes included measurements of circulating tumor (ct) DNA during protocol therapy, and analysis of individual mutations. Results: The trial has completed its planned accrual of 30 patients. Median age was 59.5 (range 30 - 70), with 40% female, 70% with DLBCL NOS and 30% with transformed indolent lymphoma (all but one patient having transformed follicular lymphoma). IPI at study entry was 0-1 (20% of patients), 2 (30%) or 3+ (50%). Grade 3 or 4 toxicity was observed in 87% of patients. This was mainly myelosuppression with grade 4 neutropenia (47%) and thrombocytopenia (37%). Other grade 4 adverse events were sepsis (2 patients), febrile neutropenia (1 patient) and hypokalemia (1 patient). No grade 5 events were attributed to study treatment. One additional case of myelodysplastic syndrome caused treatment discontinuation. Events necessitating dose reductions (33% of patients), dose delays (23%) and dose holds (23%) occurred in a total of 57% of patients. At the time of submission, data are evaluable for the primary endpoint in 28 patients. The ORR (CR + PR) by CT imaging after 2 cycles of study therapy was 60.7% (95% CI 40.6-78.5) Overall, 65.5% of patients (95%CI = 45.7%-82.1%) proceeded to ASCT. In addition, 15 patients are evaluable by PET/CT after 3 cycles of O-GDP, with 47% attaining a complete metabolic response (Deauville 1 - 3), 40% a partial metabolic response and 13% with no metabolic response by Lugano criteria. Plasma ctDNA measurements were taken at baseline, after 1 cycle of O-GDP, and at the time of PET/CT. CtDNA quantities will be compared to imaging assessments. Conclusions: O-GDP is an outpatient salvage regimen that enables ASCT in patients with R/R DLBCL. Compared to R-GDP there is a greater frequency of grade 3 - 4 toxicity (O-GDP 87%, R-GDP previously reported at 47%), although the difference is mainly due to cytopenias and can be managed by dose adjustments to the GDP regimen. Further data analysis is required to determine if the trial will meet the primary endpoint of an ORR > 60%. The overall rate of proceeding to ASCT with O-GDP salvage in this trial was 65.5% compared to that previously reported for R-GDP at 51.9%. Disclosures Scott: NanoString: Patents & Royalties: Named Inventor on a patent licensed to NanoString Technologies, Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria. Kuruvilla:BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; Abbvie: Consultancy; Leukemia and Lymphoma Society Canada: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Karyopharm: Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Princess Margaret Cancer Foundation: Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria; Lundbeck: Honoraria; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicCAR-T cell therapy research→French-language works237,207→