T Cells Engineered with a Novel Chimeric Receptor Demonstrate Durable In Vivo Efficacy Against Disseminated Multiple Myeloma
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Despite recent therapeutic developments, multiple myeloma remains an incurable plasma cell malignancy. Poor prognosis for myeloma patients relapsing post-transplant calls for the need for novel treatment options. Immunotherapy with engineered T cells has proven highly efficacious against B-cell cancers, and early-phase clinical trials suggest that multiple myeloma is susceptible to this form of therapy. We designed a new chimeric T cell receptor, T cell antigen coupler (TAC), which relies upon activation through endogenous T cell receptor complex, thus allowing engineered T cells to auto-regulate their activity (Helsen et al, Nat. Comm., 2018). Using published single-chain antibody fragments (scFvs) C11D5.3 and J22.9-xi, we generated B cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-specific TAC receptors for targeting multiple myeloma. Primary human T cells were transduced with lentiviral vectors carrying different BCMA TAC constructs and assessed for in vitro functionality via cytokine production, cytotoxicity, and proliferation assays. In vivo efficacy and T cell tracking were performed in an established orthotopic xenograft mouse model based on a BCMA-positive KMS-11 cell line. C11D5.3 and J22.9-xi TAC T cells demonstrated comparable in vitro performance with both types of cultures efficiently killing BCMA-expressing targets, producing IFN-γ, TNF-α, and IL-2 cytokines, and undergoing multiple rounds of proliferation. In vivo, TAC T cells carrying either scFv were capable of curing mice bearing disseminated myeloma; however, the TAC T cells carrying J22.9-xi scFv were more potent on a per-cell basis (Figure 1A, top panel). Mice in remission 3 months post-treatment with a single dose of 106 TAC-positive T cells showed evidence of sustained anti-tumor protection upon rechallenge with a fresh dose of 106 KMS-11 tumor cells (Figure 1B). Mice treated with low-dose J22.9-xi T cells were more resistant to rechallenge than mice treated with a comparable dose of C11D5.3 TAC T cells. Tracking of the TAC T cells in vivo revealed that the J22.9-xi TAC T cells expanded to a much larger extent than the C11D5.3 TAC T cells (Figure 1A, bottom panel), indicating that there were likely more J22.9-xi TAC T cells present at the time of tumor rechallenge. To understand whether biological aspects of BCMA may influence the proliferative response of the TAC T cells, we explored the influence of APRIL, the soluble ligand for BCMA, on TAC T cell proliferation in vitro. Strikingly, despite comparable proliferation of both TAC T cell populations following stimulation with KMS-11 tumor cells in the absence of APRIL in vitro, the presence of APRIL had a strong inhibitory effect on proliferation of C11D5.3 TAC T cells and only a modest inhibitory effect on J22.9-xi TAC T cells. Our preclinical findings support further development of TAC T cells for the treatment of multiple myeloma and underscore the importance of T cell expansion in determining the therapeutic activity of engineered T cells. This work further reveals a novel observation that the natural ligand of BCMA can impair the therapeutic impact of T cells engineered with chimeric receptors directed against BCMA and provide a basis for advancing BCMA-specific TAC T cells into the clinic. Disclosures Denisova: Triumvira Immunologics: Patents & Royalties. Afsahi:Triumvira Immunologics: Patents & Royalties. Helsen:Triumvira Immunologics: Employment, Patents & Royalties. Bramson:Triumvira Immunologics: Employment, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».