MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2908342487 · doi:10.1182/blood-2018-99-118569

T Cells Engineered with a Novel Chimeric Receptor Demonstrate Durable In Vivo Efficacy Against Disseminated Multiple Myeloma

2018· article· en· W2908342487 on OpenAlexaff
Ksenia Bezverbnaya, Vivian Wing Chong Lau, Craig Aarts, Galina Denisova, Arya Afsahi, Carole Evelegh, Derek T. Cummings, Christopher W. Helsen, Jonathan L. Bramson

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCAR-T cell therapy research
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChimeric antigen receptorMultiple myelomaCancer researchImmunotherapyIn vivoT cellMedicineCytokineImmunologyBiologyImmune system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Despite recent therapeutic developments, multiple myeloma remains an incurable plasma cell malignancy. Poor prognosis for myeloma patients relapsing post-transplant calls for the need for novel treatment options. Immunotherapy with engineered T cells has proven highly efficacious against B-cell cancers, and early-phase clinical trials suggest that multiple myeloma is susceptible to this form of therapy. We designed a new chimeric T cell receptor, T cell antigen coupler (TAC), which relies upon activation through endogenous T cell receptor complex, thus allowing engineered T cells to auto-regulate their activity (Helsen et al, Nat. Comm., 2018). Using published single-chain antibody fragments (scFvs) C11D5.3 and J22.9-xi, we generated B cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-specific TAC receptors for targeting multiple myeloma. Primary human T cells were transduced with lentiviral vectors carrying different BCMA TAC constructs and assessed for in vitro functionality via cytokine production, cytotoxicity, and proliferation assays. In vivo efficacy and T cell tracking were performed in an established orthotopic xenograft mouse model based on a BCMA-positive KMS-11 cell line. C11D5.3 and J22.9-xi TAC T cells demonstrated comparable in vitro performance with both types of cultures efficiently killing BCMA-expressing targets, producing IFN-γ, TNF-α, and IL-2 cytokines, and undergoing multiple rounds of proliferation. In vivo, TAC T cells carrying either scFv were capable of curing mice bearing disseminated myeloma; however, the TAC T cells carrying J22.9-xi scFv were more potent on a per-cell basis (Figure 1A, top panel). Mice in remission 3 months post-treatment with a single dose of 106 TAC-positive T cells showed evidence of sustained anti-tumor protection upon rechallenge with a fresh dose of 106 KMS-11 tumor cells (Figure 1B). Mice treated with low-dose J22.9-xi T cells were more resistant to rechallenge than mice treated with a comparable dose of C11D5.3 TAC T cells. Tracking of the TAC T cells in vivo revealed that the J22.9-xi TAC T cells expanded to a much larger extent than the C11D5.3 TAC T cells (Figure 1A, bottom panel), indicating that there were likely more J22.9-xi TAC T cells present at the time of tumor rechallenge. To understand whether biological aspects of BCMA may influence the proliferative response of the TAC T cells, we explored the influence of APRIL, the soluble ligand for BCMA, on TAC T cell proliferation in vitro. Strikingly, despite comparable proliferation of both TAC T cell populations following stimulation with KMS-11 tumor cells in the absence of APRIL in vitro, the presence of APRIL had a strong inhibitory effect on proliferation of C11D5.3 TAC T cells and only a modest inhibitory effect on J22.9-xi TAC T cells. Our preclinical findings support further development of TAC T cells for the treatment of multiple myeloma and underscore the importance of T cell expansion in determining the therapeutic activity of engineered T cells. This work further reveals a novel observation that the natural ligand of BCMA can impair the therapeutic impact of T cells engineered with chimeric receptors directed against BCMA and provide a basis for advancing BCMA-specific TAC T cells into the clinic. Disclosures Denisova: Triumvira Immunologics: Patents & Royalties. Afsahi:Triumvira Immunologics: Patents & Royalties. Helsen:Triumvira Immunologics: Employment, Patents & Royalties. Bramson:Triumvira Immunologics: Employment, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicCAR-T cell therapy researchFrench-language works237,207