The impact of insite, North America's first supervised injection facitity, and possible implementation in Massachusetts
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The impact of the opioid crisis has been worsening in recent years. Opioid-related overdose deaths in the United States have reached 9.0 per 100,000 people and in Massachusetts the number is even worse at 17.3 per 100,000. People who inject drugs (PWID) are at high risk of overdose death, of superficial and deep tissue bacterial infections, and of chronic viral infections such as human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV), which can be transmitted through shared injection equipment. Although abstinence from substances is the best way to avoid these outcomes, the complicated nature of substance use disorder (SUD) means that not everyone will be able to stop substance use at any given time. The concept of harm reduction is based on engaging PWID who are not ready or able to stop substance use, to reduce the frequency of adverse outcomes. One intervention supported by harm reductionists is medically supervised infection facilities (SIFs), which are locations where PWID may inject substances under medical supervision. People are provided with clean equipment and are monitored post-injection so that medical intervention can be provided in case of an overdose. Furthermore, people are able to access a variety of health services, including wound care, condom access, and referrals to SUD treatment. \nIn 2003, Insite in Vancouver, Canada became North America’s first legally sanctioned SIF. Research conducted since its opening has shown many positive benefits. Insite has been credited with the prevention of overdose deaths and the encouragement of safer injection practices both inside and outside of the facility. In addition, the facility has been shown to be an effective bridge to addiction treatment, particularly among higher risk PWID. The presence of Insite has also been associated with a reduction in public injections. Furthermore, Insite does not appear to increase the number of people who are actively injecting, nor does it serve as a location for people who are injecting drugs for the first time. \n\tBecause of these benefits, there has been growing interest in establishing an SIF within the United States. Advocacy groups, including the Massachusetts Medical Society, have begun to press for one within Massachusetts. Moreover, the PWID community in Boston has expressed interest in taking advantage of the harm reduction benefits that an SIF can offer. Efforts to establish an SIF, however, face several barriers including state and federal drug laws and political opposition to such a facility. The stigma associated with SUD and the very idea of an SIF is an issue that must be addressed in order to bring this life saving tool to Massachusetts.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».