Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Jacob Jennings Brown was one of the few consistently successful American generals in the War of 1812. He faced British regular troops in four battles—Sackets Harbor in 1813 and Chippewa, Lundy's Lane, and Fort Erie in 1814—and, if Lundy's Lane be counted an American success rather than a draw, he emerged victorious on each occasion. Yet Brown has never received his due, either from biographers or from any other historians of the early republic. John D. Morris has remedied this neglect in this attractive, well-researched, and interesting study of a man whose life and career reflected the changes that his family, his region, his nation, and his profession experienced between the age of Thomas Jefferson and the age of Andrew Jackson. Brown's early days were dominated by the problems of land speculation and commercial development in upstate New York, particularly those arising from the dependence of that region on Montreal as its major market. Economic necessity drove Brown to become a smuggler during the embargo years of 1807 to 1809, and he continued to do business with Montreal throughout his life. His political loyalty to the Republican party, however, was never in doubt, and after his role in repelling a British attack on Sackets Harbor in May 1813 he entered the army as a brigadier general and replacement for Zebulon Montgomery Pike. He then succeeded James Wilkinson as a major general in time to command American forces in the Niagara peninsula campaigns of 1814. Morris carefully analyzes Brown's conduct throughout these campaigns. He argues, convincingly, that Brown's main strengths were his determination, his organizational skills, and his ability to work well with other officers and with citizen soldiers; many of the latter, apparently, were less well trained in 1814 than the self-promoting Winfield Scott was later to claim credit for. That the United States did not accomplish more of strategic significance in these campaigns was less a comment on Brown's abilities than it was a reflection of the larger incapacity of the government to organize and coordinate its offensives against Canada.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,004 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,019 | 0,003 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».