Exploring Risk Perception of an Emerging Environmental Health Risk: A case study of allergic disease in youth team sport in Ontario, Canada
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Asthma is the most common chronic disease among children worldwide, and approximately 3.8 million Canadians are diagnosed. Although the relationship is complex, participation in physical activity is recommended as part of a comprehensive asthma management plan, as it can reduce symptoms and improve wellbeing for those affected. Team sport participation is a common way for children and youth to engage in physical activity. The spaces in which team sport is experienced can present unique challenges for vulnerable children, and evidence suggests that those with asthma may be less physically active than their non-asthmatic peers. While asthmatic youth may experience barriers to sport participation, effective allergic disease management that includes coach consideration of the environmental contexts of sport can help asthmatic athletes maintain long-term engagement in activity. \n \nThe research presented in this thesis therefore aims to increase understanding of how children, parents and organized youth team sport coaches in Ontario understand and manage the links between allergic disease, the environment and physical activity. The research focuses on three broad objectives: first, to explore the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of users and providers of child and youth team sport with respect to the links between the environment, allergic disease and physical activity; second, to investigate the impact of a coach education module related to coach attitudes and behaviours regarding the links between the environment, allergic disease and physical activity; and finally, to document the factors shaping the perception of asthma as an emerging environmental health risk in Ontario youth team sport. A mixed-methods case study approach was used in this research. \n \nThere is an inherent geographic component to understanding how environmental factors impact allergic disease risk in organized team sport. Understanding how elements of the environment are managed and risk is perceived amongst sport stakeholders is important for effective asthma management. In-depth interviews with coaches (n=18) and athletes with asthma (n=11) suggest that ensuring both the physical (e.g., recognizing potential triggers) and social (e.g., reducing stigmatization) needs of vulnerable athletes are recognized is important to maximize enjoyment and performance, and improve asthma management for those affected. Focus groups with coaches (n=12) indicate that while coaches perceived an education module related to the environment, physical activity and allergic disease as valuable, some content was considered less relevant, and barriers to its implementation (e.g., coach autonomy) were identified. Finally, multivariate analysis of two surveys (coaches, n=94; parents of athletes with allergic disease, n=90) suggests that various factors (e.g., exposure, education, propensity for risk, gender) contribute to how asthma risk is perceived amongst and between sport stakeholders, emphasizing the value of population-specific risk management communication. \n \nThis research makes multiple important contributions. Theoretically, a place-based conceptual framework for understanding public experience of risk was applied; this framework informed research design, and recommendations (e.g., consideration of scale) with respect to future application are offered. The use of multiple and mixed methods, and including a potentially vulnerable group in the interviews, allowed for enhanced understanding of the factors that contribute to asthma management in sport. Substantively, this research contributed to the Geographies of Asthma literature, increasing understanding of asthma risk perception outcomes, and the environmental factors (e.g., sociocultural, political) that contribute to how asthma is perceived amongst sport stakeholders in Ontario. Considering the environmental contexts of risk is therefore critical to improve environment and health management in Ontario organized team sport, and reduce the future chronic disease burden associated with physical inactivity in Canada.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,019 | 0,003 |
| Communication savante | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».