P722 Results of the STAR study: management of ulcerative colitis in private practice in france, in the first years following diagnosis
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The STAR study was conducted to describe the management of ulcerative colitis (UC) in private practices in France and to compare real-life data with European guidelines. STAR is an observational, retrospective, multicentre French study, conducted with private practice gastroenterologists. Data were collected in the medical records of patients, aged ≥18 years (yr), diagnosed with UC in the last 36 months (M) and followed-up for at least 12 M. Ninety physicians included 249 patients, median age 36 yr, 48.7% women and 11.8% smokers. Median UC duration was 17.7 M. The Montreal classification of UC extent was E1 41.5%, E2 39.4% and E3 19.1%. Mean disease severity perceived by physicians (EVA 0–100 mm) was 35.07 at diagnosis and 19.00 at last visit. Mean Partial Mayo Score (PMS) was 4.20 at diagnosis and 2.02 at last visit. PMS at diagnosis was 58.2% mild, 25.8% moderate, and 11.1% severe. At last visit PMS was 51.1% remission, 37.1% mild, 7.4% moderate and 4.4% severe. The first endoscopy at diagnosis showed 38.3% light activity, 54.7% moderate and 5.5% severe activity. During the first yr of treatment (trt), 76.8% patients had no endoscopy, 9.1% had colonoscopy, 4.1% rectoscopy and 10% sigmoidoscopy. In the first yr of trt, endoscopies showed healing in 28.3% patients, mild activity 39.6%, moderate 26.4% and severe 5, 7%. Trt was 5-ASA in 97.9% patients, steroids 44.9%, immunosuppressants 20.3%, anti-TNF 18.2%. At last visit, 37.3% patients were no longer receiving 5-ASA. Oral 5-ASA was prescribed in 39.7% patients, rectal 27.5% and both 32.8% patients. 5-ASA was effective from first M in 79% patients. Mean dose oral 5-ASA induction trt was 3.60 g/day. Sixty-seven per cent patients had optimal mesalazine induction trt ( ≥4 g/day) and 13.1% had lower dose than European recommendations ( < 2.4 g/day). Mean oral 5-ASA maintenance dose was 2.14 g/day. Mean rectal induction dose mesalazine was 1.36 g/day. Median duration of oral induction trt was 83.5 vs. 48.5 d for rectal. 66.8% patients treated with 5-ASA first-line required no other drug class. 6.8% patients were hospitalised from diagnosis until the day of the visit. Since the diagnosis until the day of the last visit, 44.9% patients had steroids, 20.3% had immunosuppressants and 18.2% had at least one anti-TNF. Initiation of anti-TNF trt was not related to the severity of the disease at diagnosis (Mayo score 5). 5-ASA is the gold standard trt in UC induction and maintenance management and was effective from the first M of trt. 1/5 patients were treated with immunosuppressants and 1/5 with anti-TNF indicating that many patients went directly from 5-ASA to anti-TNF without exposition to immunosuppressants. The very high use of anti-TNF in mild-to-moderate UC could partly be explained by 5-ASA underdosing.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,005 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».