MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2914077857 · doi:10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjy222.846

P722 Results of the STAR study: management of ulcerative colitis in private practice in france, in the first years following diagnosis

2019· article· en· W2914077857 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Arnaud Bourreille, Stéphane Nancey, A. Attar, Harry Sokol, Laurent Peyrin‐Biroulet, Yoram Bouhnik, Xavier Roblin, Guillaume Bonnaud

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Crohn s and Colitis · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineUlcerative colitisSigmoidoscopyColonoscopyInternal medicinePrivate practiceMedical recordObservational studyRetrospective cohort studyEndoscopyGastroenterologyDiseaseColorectal cancerCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The STAR study was conducted to describe the management of ulcerative colitis (UC) in private practices in France and to compare real-life data with European guidelines. STAR is an observational, retrospective, multicentre French study, conducted with private practice gastroenterologists. Data were collected in the medical records of patients, aged ≥18 years (yr), diagnosed with UC in the last 36 months (M) and followed-up for at least 12 M. Ninety physicians included 249 patients, median age 36 yr, 48.7% women and 11.8% smokers. Median UC duration was 17.7 M. The Montreal classification of UC extent was E1 41.5%, E2 39.4% and E3 19.1%. Mean disease severity perceived by physicians (EVA 0–100 mm) was 35.07 at diagnosis and 19.00 at last visit. Mean Partial Mayo Score (PMS) was 4.20 at diagnosis and 2.02 at last visit. PMS at diagnosis was 58.2% mild, 25.8% moderate, and 11.1% severe. At last visit PMS was 51.1% remission, 37.1% mild, 7.4% moderate and 4.4% severe. The first endoscopy at diagnosis showed 38.3% light activity, 54.7% moderate and 5.5% severe activity. During the first yr of treatment (trt), 76.8% patients had no endoscopy, 9.1% had colonoscopy, 4.1% rectoscopy and 10% sigmoidoscopy. In the first yr of trt, endoscopies showed healing in 28.3% patients, mild activity 39.6%, moderate 26.4% and severe 5, 7%. Trt was 5-ASA in 97.9% patients, steroids 44.9%, immunosuppressants 20.3%, anti-TNF 18.2%. At last visit, 37.3% patients were no longer receiving 5-ASA. Oral 5-ASA was prescribed in 39.7% patients, rectal 27.5% and both 32.8% patients. 5-ASA was effective from first M in 79% patients. Mean dose oral 5-ASA induction trt was 3.60 g/day. Sixty-seven per cent patients had optimal mesalazine induction trt ( ≥4 g/day) and 13.1% had lower dose than European recommendations ( < 2.4 g/day). Mean oral 5-ASA maintenance dose was 2.14 g/day. Mean rectal induction dose mesalazine was 1.36 g/day. Median duration of oral induction trt was 83.5 vs. 48.5 d for rectal. 66.8% patients treated with 5-ASA first-line required no other drug class. 6.8% patients were hospitalised from diagnosis until the day of the visit. Since the diagnosis until the day of the last visit, 44.9% patients had steroids, 20.3% had immunosuppressants and 18.2% had at least one anti-TNF. Initiation of anti-TNF trt was not related to the severity of the disease at diagnosis (Mayo score 5). 5-ASA is the gold standard trt in UC induction and maintenance management and was effective from the first M of trt. 1/5 patients were treated with immunosuppressants and 1/5 with anti-TNF indicating that many patients went directly from 5-ASA to anti-TNF without exposition to immunosuppressants. The very high use of anti-TNF in mild-to-moderate UC could partly be explained by 5-ASA underdosing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.037

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Crohn s and Colitis→Same topicInflammatory Bowel Disease→French-language works237,207→