MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2914667081 · doi:10.1182/blood-2018-99-113099

A Pooled Analysis of Survival By Defibrotide Timing of Initiation in Adults with Veno-Occlusive Disease/Sinusoidal Obstruction Syndrome (VOD/SOS) Following Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant (HSCT)

2018· article· en· W2914667081 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Paul G. Richardson, Enric Carreras, Antonio Pagliuca, Robert J. Ryan, William Tappe, Mohamad Mohty

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2018
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueHematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésDefibrotideMedicineHepatic veno-occlusive diseaseExpanded accessHematopoietic stem cell transplantationSurgeryComplicationInternal medicineTransplantation

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction Hepatic VOD/SOS is a potentially life-threatening complication of HSCT or of nontransplant-associated high-dose chemotherapy. VOD/SOS associated with multi-organ dysfunction (MOD; eg, renal or pulmonary dysfunction) may be associated with >80% mortality. Defibrotide is approved to treat hepatic VOD/SOS with renal and/or pulmonary dysfunction post-HSCT in the United States and Canada, and to treat severe hepatic VOD/SOS post-HSCT in patients aged >1 month in the European Union. Prior to US approval, defibrotide was available through an international compassionate-use program (CUP; 1998-2009) and an expanded-access protocol (T-IND; 2007-2016). Data for adults with VOD/SOS post-HSCT from the CUP and the T-IND were pooled to investigate whether the time to initiate defibrotide therapy after VOD/SOS diagnosis had an impact on Day +100 survival. Methods In both the CUP (N=710) and the T-IND (N=1137), defibrotide was used to treat hepatic VOD/SOS following HSCT or nontransplant-associated chemotherapy in pediatric and adult patients with or without MOD. Diagnosis of VOD/SOS was made using the Baltimore or modified Seattle criteria or was proven by biopsy (the CUP also allowed patients with hemodynamic, ultrasound, or histologic evidence of VOD/SOS to enroll). In the CUP cohort, the defibrotide median daily dose was 25 mg/kg/day administered for a median of 15 days; only patients who received 25 mg/kg/day were included in the analysis. In the T-IND, the defibrotide dose was 25 mg/kg/day for a recommended administration ≥21 days. In this analysis, adult patients (aged >18 years) from the CUP and the T-IND with VOD/SOS post-HSCT were pooled to examine Day +100 survival rates by time to start of defibrotide post-diagnosis. The first analysis examined patients who initiated defibrotide before/after Days 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, and 14 after VOD/SOS diagnosis, using Fisher's exact test, and the second examined starting defibrotide on a particular day: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8-14, and ≥15 (Cochran-Armitage test for trend across days). Results Of 534 pooled adult patients with VOD/SOS following HSCT who were treated with defibrotide 25 mg/kg/day and had reported time to dosing, 300 (56%) patients had MOD. Defibrotide treatment was initiated by Day 1 in 273 (51%) patients. In the analysis of treatment initiation before or after Days 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, and 14, earlier initiation of defibrotide showed numerically higher survival rates for all cut points (Day +100 survival before and after all cut points is provided in Table 1). Cochran-Armitage test for trend in the overall group suggested that Day +100 survival was higher with earlier initiation following diagnosis (nominal P=0.011; for patients with MOD, P=0.048; Table 2). Safety information for the CUP and T-IND were not pooled, as adverse events in the CUP were reported only if those events caused death in a consistent fashion. In all adult patients with post-HSCT VOD/SOS in the T-IND, treatment-related adverse events that occurred in ≥2% of adults were epistaxis and gastrointestinal hemorrhage (3.5% each), pulmonary hemorrhage (2.3%), and hematuria and hypotension (2.1% each). Conclusion: These results from the pooled post hoc analysis of adult patients with VOD/SOS post-HSCT from the CUP and T-IND studies suggest that earlier defibrotide initiation post-VOD/SOS diagnosis may improve Day +100 survival outcomes, although no specific day post-diagnosis provides a clinically meaningful cutoff for better outcome, suggesting that later intervention still retains value if therapy is not initiated sooner. Causes of treatment delay were not assessed. The safety profile for these patients was consistent with other defibrotide studies in VOD/SOS. Support: Jazz Pharmaceuticals. Disclosures Richardson: Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Oncopeptides: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Research Funding; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Carreras:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Pagliuca:Gentium: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Ryan:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Employment, Other: Stock and stock options. Tappe:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Employment, Other: Stock and stock options. Mohty:Molmed: Consultancy; Servier: Consultancy; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; MaaT Pharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Myers: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,009
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Méta-analyse · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,009
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,047

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0090,010
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0040,013
Bibliométrie0,0020,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,009
Tête enseignante GPT0,227
Écart entre enseignants0,218 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeMéta-analyse
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2018
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBlood→Même sujetHematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation→Travaux en français237 207→