MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2914667081 · doi:10.1182/blood-2018-99-113099

A Pooled Analysis of Survival By Defibrotide Timing of Initiation in Adults with Veno-Occlusive Disease/Sinusoidal Obstruction Syndrome (VOD/SOS) Following Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant (HSCT)

2018· article· en· W2914667081 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Paul G. Richardson, Enric Carreras, Antonio Pagliuca, Robert J. Ryan, William Tappe, Mohamad Mohty

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDefibrotideMedicineHepatic veno-occlusive diseaseExpanded accessHematopoietic stem cell transplantationSurgeryComplicationInternal medicineTransplantation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction Hepatic VOD/SOS is a potentially life-threatening complication of HSCT or of nontransplant-associated high-dose chemotherapy. VOD/SOS associated with multi-organ dysfunction (MOD; eg, renal or pulmonary dysfunction) may be associated with >80% mortality. Defibrotide is approved to treat hepatic VOD/SOS with renal and/or pulmonary dysfunction post-HSCT in the United States and Canada, and to treat severe hepatic VOD/SOS post-HSCT in patients aged >1 month in the European Union. Prior to US approval, defibrotide was available through an international compassionate-use program (CUP; 1998-2009) and an expanded-access protocol (T-IND; 2007-2016). Data for adults with VOD/SOS post-HSCT from the CUP and the T-IND were pooled to investigate whether the time to initiate defibrotide therapy after VOD/SOS diagnosis had an impact on Day +100 survival. Methods In both the CUP (N=710) and the T-IND (N=1137), defibrotide was used to treat hepatic VOD/SOS following HSCT or nontransplant-associated chemotherapy in pediatric and adult patients with or without MOD. Diagnosis of VOD/SOS was made using the Baltimore or modified Seattle criteria or was proven by biopsy (the CUP also allowed patients with hemodynamic, ultrasound, or histologic evidence of VOD/SOS to enroll). In the CUP cohort, the defibrotide median daily dose was 25 mg/kg/day administered for a median of 15 days; only patients who received 25 mg/kg/day were included in the analysis. In the T-IND, the defibrotide dose was 25 mg/kg/day for a recommended administration ≥21 days. In this analysis, adult patients (aged >18 years) from the CUP and the T-IND with VOD/SOS post-HSCT were pooled to examine Day +100 survival rates by time to start of defibrotide post-diagnosis. The first analysis examined patients who initiated defibrotide before/after Days 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, and 14 after VOD/SOS diagnosis, using Fisher's exact test, and the second examined starting defibrotide on a particular day: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8-14, and ≥15 (Cochran-Armitage test for trend across days). Results Of 534 pooled adult patients with VOD/SOS following HSCT who were treated with defibrotide 25 mg/kg/day and had reported time to dosing, 300 (56%) patients had MOD. Defibrotide treatment was initiated by Day 1 in 273 (51%) patients. In the analysis of treatment initiation before or after Days 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, and 14, earlier initiation of defibrotide showed numerically higher survival rates for all cut points (Day +100 survival before and after all cut points is provided in Table 1). Cochran-Armitage test for trend in the overall group suggested that Day +100 survival was higher with earlier initiation following diagnosis (nominal P=0.011; for patients with MOD, P=0.048; Table 2). Safety information for the CUP and T-IND were not pooled, as adverse events in the CUP were reported only if those events caused death in a consistent fashion. In all adult patients with post-HSCT VOD/SOS in the T-IND, treatment-related adverse events that occurred in ≥2% of adults were epistaxis and gastrointestinal hemorrhage (3.5% each), pulmonary hemorrhage (2.3%), and hematuria and hypotension (2.1% each). Conclusion: These results from the pooled post hoc analysis of adult patients with VOD/SOS post-HSCT from the CUP and T-IND studies suggest that earlier defibrotide initiation post-VOD/SOS diagnosis may improve Day +100 survival outcomes, although no specific day post-diagnosis provides a clinically meaningful cutoff for better outcome, suggesting that later intervention still retains value if therapy is not initiated sooner. Causes of treatment delay were not assessed. The safety profile for these patients was consistent with other defibrotide studies in VOD/SOS. Support: Jazz Pharmaceuticals. Disclosures Richardson: Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Oncopeptides: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Research Funding; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Carreras:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Pagliuca:Gentium: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Ryan:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Employment, Other: Stock and stock options. Tappe:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Employment, Other: Stock and stock options. Mohty:Molmed: Consultancy; Servier: Consultancy; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; MaaT Pharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Myers: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.047

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.013
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicHematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation→French-language works237,207→