Infliximab as Rescue Therapy for Hospitalized Patients With Crohnʼs Disease Failing Intravenous Corticosteroids
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Introduction: Infliximab (IFX) has been shown to be effective rescue therapy for ulcerative colitis in hospitalized patients failing intravenous (IV) corticosteroids (CS). However there is little evidence describing its use in similar hospitalized Crohn's Disease (CD) patients. Our aim was to determine if IFX is effective rescue therapy for corticosteroid (CS) resistant CD in hospitalized patients. Methods: All in-patients with CD who received IFX as rescue therapy at Northshore University and Long Island Jewish hospitals from 2007 to 2016 were selected. Records were reviewed for demographics, Montreal classification of CD, pre-admission and inpatient treatment, surgical rates, and 30 and 90-day readmission rates. Only patients failing IV CS prior to IFX were included in the final analysis.Table: Table. Patient DemographicsTable: Table. Dosage of intravenous corticosteroid and infliximab administered during hospitalizationResults: A total of 40 patients received IFX, of which 17 had failed IV CS. Patient demographics are listed in table 1. Mean hospital stay was 9.8 days (range 4 to 30). At admission, 55% were taking oral CS (n=9). Four patients were on outpatient IFX therapy, but still received IV CS during hospitalization prior to IFX. Doses of IV CS and IFX are listed in table 2. The mean duration of IV CS therapy before IFX was 6.9 days (range 4 to 18). Two patients failed IFX and required surgery including a colectomy for pan-colitis with spontaneous perforation, and an ileocolectomy for terminal ileal stricture. Neither patient had received IFX as an outpatient. Of the 15 patients who responded to rescue IFX, the median duration of hospital stay following IFX was 3 days (range 3 to 18 days). Re-admission rates were 29% and 47% at 30 and 90 days respectively, without further surgeries noted. Conclusion: In our series severe CD patients failing IV CS treated with IFX had low rates of urgent surgery and a generally rapid response to treatment, supporting IFX as an effective rescue therapy. By only including those with prior failure of IV CS, we have likely excluded patients for whom IFX was given in the hospital for reasons other than severe disease. Our results suggest that even individuals with severe acute CD flare can be treated with early introduction of IFX, avoiding prolonged CS use and hospitalization. With more biologic therapies becoming available, further trials are needed to assess the efficacy of IFX and newer agents to correctly position rescue therapies for severe CD.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».