MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Infliximab as Rescue Therapy for Hospitalized Patients With Crohnʼs Disease Failing Intravenous Corticosteroids

2017· article· en· W2915016024 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Anish V. Patel, Jacqueline M. Moore, Keith Sultan

Bibliographic record

VenueThe American Journal of Gastroenterology · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInfliximabUlcerative colitisColectomyRescue therapyDemographicsInternal medicinePerforationSurgeryRetrospective cohort studyDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Infliximab (IFX) has been shown to be effective rescue therapy for ulcerative colitis in hospitalized patients failing intravenous (IV) corticosteroids (CS). However there is little evidence describing its use in similar hospitalized Crohn's Disease (CD) patients. Our aim was to determine if IFX is effective rescue therapy for corticosteroid (CS) resistant CD in hospitalized patients. Methods: All in-patients with CD who received IFX as rescue therapy at Northshore University and Long Island Jewish hospitals from 2007 to 2016 were selected. Records were reviewed for demographics, Montreal classification of CD, pre-admission and inpatient treatment, surgical rates, and 30 and 90-day readmission rates. Only patients failing IV CS prior to IFX were included in the final analysis.Table: Table. Patient DemographicsTable: Table. Dosage of intravenous corticosteroid and infliximab administered during hospitalizationResults: A total of 40 patients received IFX, of which 17 had failed IV CS. Patient demographics are listed in table 1. Mean hospital stay was 9.8 days (range 4 to 30). At admission, 55% were taking oral CS (n=9). Four patients were on outpatient IFX therapy, but still received IV CS during hospitalization prior to IFX. Doses of IV CS and IFX are listed in table 2. The mean duration of IV CS therapy before IFX was 6.9 days (range 4 to 18). Two patients failed IFX and required surgery including a colectomy for pan-colitis with spontaneous perforation, and an ileocolectomy for terminal ileal stricture. Neither patient had received IFX as an outpatient. Of the 15 patients who responded to rescue IFX, the median duration of hospital stay following IFX was 3 days (range 3 to 18 days). Re-admission rates were 29% and 47% at 30 and 90 days respectively, without further surgeries noted. Conclusion: In our series severe CD patients failing IV CS treated with IFX had low rates of urgent surgery and a generally rapid response to treatment, supporting IFX as an effective rescue therapy. By only including those with prior failure of IV CS, we have likely excluded patients for whom IFX was given in the hospital for reasons other than severe disease. Our results suggest that even individuals with severe acute CD flare can be treated with early introduction of IFX, avoiding prolonged CS use and hospitalization. With more biologic therapies becoming available, further trials are needed to assess the efficacy of IFX and newer agents to correctly position rescue therapies for severe CD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe American Journal of Gastroenterology→Same topicInflammatory Bowel Disease→French-language works237,207→