Relational Dynamics Supporting Client Orientation: Perspectives from the Front Lines of Service Delivery
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This study explored how identification processes among front-line workers influence client orientation. We interviewed 15 front-line workers from two sport/leisure organizations. Thematic analyses of interview results suggest how identification and relational processes can foster client orientation. Front-line workers may identify with co-workers, the organization (mission was particularly important), the client, and even the activity for which they are responsible. Identification with these targets offers insight into how to treat clients. For example, several of those interviewed noted the importance of mission statements in setting the tone for a client orientation. Two conditions seemed important. First, the mission statement must offer clarity into the role of client orientation in the service delivery model. It should focus directly on serving the client. Second, it must be crafted in a way that encourages identification by staff members. They must see their own value system within the mission statement. These identification processes became critical when other identification targets (in this case, other staff) offered direction that was incompatible with client orientation. We found, for example, that at times co-workers’ values and behaviours could be inconsistent with client orientation. On such occasions, though, those with already high client orientation tendencies failed to identify with, or at least model, the behaviours of their co-workers. Instead they looked to vision for service laid out by the organization. These findings also highlight the importance of staff-participant and staff-activity identification. Observers believed that staff members sharing a sense of similarity and familiarity with program participants, often possessed a client orientation. Particularly striking in our interviews was the notion of a shared passion for the activity (e.g., special event or sport) in developing client orientation. Most leisure service staff described here had a background in the activity they facilitated. As a result, they had a strong passion for that activity. When they interacted with participants who also demonstrated a passion for the activity, identification processes were enhanced. This identification seemed to aid in client orientation. Finally, participants described how job descriptions often failed to capture the nuances of client orientation and instead focused on core tasks. It is perhaps unsurprising then, that client orientation was described as being a lower priority among staff who focused on tasks (as laid out in their job descriptions or in policy). Subscribe to JPRA
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».