MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2921394315 · doi:10.1182/blood-2018-99-115611

Quantitative Modeling of Ineffective Hematopoiesis in Myelodysplastic Syndrome Patients Yields Distinct Clinical Phenotypes and Can Identify a State of Disease Predictive of Loss of Response to Azacitidine

2018· article· en· W2921394315 sur OpenAlexaff
Roman M. Shapiro, Alejandro Lazo‐Langner, Adam R. Stinchcombe

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2018
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueAcute Myeloid Leukemia Research
Établissements canadiensLondon Health Sciences CentreUniversity of Toronto
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésHaematopoiesisMyelodysplastic syndromesBone marrowInternational Prognostic Scoring SystemMyeloidDiseaseProgenitor cellImmunologyOncologyPopulationMedicineInternal medicineBiologyBioinformaticsStem cellGenetics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Background: The implementation of genomic data from myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) patients into clinical practice requires its association with MDS disease activity. However, the determination of a genotype-phenotype correlation in MDS where the disease phenotype is ineffective hematopoiesis, is not straightforward. Part of the problem may be that disease activity reflected by a change in blast count, a change in a peripheral blood count, or the acquisition of a new cytogenetic abnormality does not currently provide any information about the likely dynamics of hematopoietic progenitors underlying this change. Being able to reliably infer a change in the early hematopoietic progenitor compartment of MDS patients where the disease clone likely resides that can account for the phenotype of ineffective hematopoiesis is an important step in the development of a tool to measure disease activity over time. We aim to apply a quantitative model of hematopoiesis based on parameters known to affect hematopoietic progenitor population dynamics, including rate of self-renewal, rate of proliferation, rate of differentiation, and rate of apoptosis. The mathematical formulation based on delay-differential equations has been successfully used to model the peripheral blood counts of CML and cyclic neutropenia. The goal is to identify unique MDS disease states based on the parameters described in the model, and to correlate these with both genotype and clinical outcomes. Methods: MDS patients with IPSS intermediate-2/high diagnosed during the period 2010-2017 at the London Health Science Centre had their bone marrow aspirate and biopsy data at diagnosis, laboratory data while on treatment with azacitidine and following disease progression, and transfusion history collected. The time-dependence of the peripheral blood counts for each patient were modeled using a delay-differential equation (Colijn and Mackey, 2005), with parameters representative of rates of proliferation, self-renewal, differentiation, and apoptosis of the stem cell and progenitor compartments. The model was integrated with MATLAB's dde23 routine and the model parameters were fit to the peripheral blood counts using gradient descent for the constrained non-linear least squares problem. The patients were separated into two clusters using the k-means clustering of all the model parameters using the city-block distance measure. The number of clusters were determined using the Calinski-Harabasz criterion. Results: Seventy-seven patients with a diagnosis of IPSS intermediate-2/high risk MDS were included in the analysis. Model fitting of the peripheral blood count data of 1000 simulated healthy patients whose blood count parameters were within their respective normal ranges over time yielded baseline variability of hematopoietic kinetic parameters (Figure 1). Two main groups of MDS patients could be identified from model fitting: MDS 1 and MDS 2, both of which could be best distinguished from the simulated healthy patients based on the parameter for the rate of megakaryocytic differentiation. MDS 1 and MDS 2 also had distinct parameters for the rates of hematopoietic progenitor proliferation, describing two different phenotypes of disease activity. The red blood cell count of a representative patient in MDS 1 is shown in Figure 2, where application of the Akaike information criterion identified the most likely time point when the hematopoietic kinetic parameters accounting for the peripheral red blood cell count changed after initiation of azacitidine. This time point preceded proven disease progression by 40 days. Conclusion: Parameterization of hematopoiesis with a model that can infer the kinetics of hematopoietic compartments in the bone marrow provides a powerful tool for measuring ineffective hematopoiesis in MDS patients. The resulting kinetic parameters can identify distinct groups of MDS patients based on the phenotype of their disease. The next step would be to correlate the different kinetic parameters distinguishing these groups to their disease genotypes using next-generation sequencing. On an individual patient level, these parameters can identify the most likely time when the disease phenotype changes. The development of a dynamic score predicting the change in disease activity based on hematopoietic kinetic parameters derived from peripheral blood count data over time is ongoing. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Simulation ou modélisation · Signal consensuel: Simulation ou modélisation
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,009
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,018

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,025
Tête enseignante GPT0,338
Écart entre enseignants0,313 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSimulation ou modélisation
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2018
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBlood→Même sujetAcute Myeloid Leukemia Research→Travaux en français237 207→