MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2921394315 · doi:10.1182/blood-2018-99-115611

Quantitative Modeling of Ineffective Hematopoiesis in Myelodysplastic Syndrome Patients Yields Distinct Clinical Phenotypes and Can Identify a State of Disease Predictive of Loss of Response to Azacitidine

2018· article· en· W2921394315 on OpenAlexaff
Roman M. Shapiro, Alejandro Lazo‐Langner, Adam R. Stinchcombe

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Myeloid Leukemia Research
Canadian institutionsLondon Health Sciences CentreUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHaematopoiesisMyelodysplastic syndromesBone marrowInternational Prognostic Scoring SystemMyeloidDiseaseProgenitor cellImmunologyOncologyPopulationMedicineInternal medicineBiologyBioinformaticsStem cellGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: The implementation of genomic data from myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) patients into clinical practice requires its association with MDS disease activity. However, the determination of a genotype-phenotype correlation in MDS where the disease phenotype is ineffective hematopoiesis, is not straightforward. Part of the problem may be that disease activity reflected by a change in blast count, a change in a peripheral blood count, or the acquisition of a new cytogenetic abnormality does not currently provide any information about the likely dynamics of hematopoietic progenitors underlying this change. Being able to reliably infer a change in the early hematopoietic progenitor compartment of MDS patients where the disease clone likely resides that can account for the phenotype of ineffective hematopoiesis is an important step in the development of a tool to measure disease activity over time. We aim to apply a quantitative model of hematopoiesis based on parameters known to affect hematopoietic progenitor population dynamics, including rate of self-renewal, rate of proliferation, rate of differentiation, and rate of apoptosis. The mathematical formulation based on delay-differential equations has been successfully used to model the peripheral blood counts of CML and cyclic neutropenia. The goal is to identify unique MDS disease states based on the parameters described in the model, and to correlate these with both genotype and clinical outcomes. Methods: MDS patients with IPSS intermediate-2/high diagnosed during the period 2010-2017 at the London Health Science Centre had their bone marrow aspirate and biopsy data at diagnosis, laboratory data while on treatment with azacitidine and following disease progression, and transfusion history collected. The time-dependence of the peripheral blood counts for each patient were modeled using a delay-differential equation (Colijn and Mackey, 2005), with parameters representative of rates of proliferation, self-renewal, differentiation, and apoptosis of the stem cell and progenitor compartments. The model was integrated with MATLAB's dde23 routine and the model parameters were fit to the peripheral blood counts using gradient descent for the constrained non-linear least squares problem. The patients were separated into two clusters using the k-means clustering of all the model parameters using the city-block distance measure. The number of clusters were determined using the Calinski-Harabasz criterion. Results: Seventy-seven patients with a diagnosis of IPSS intermediate-2/high risk MDS were included in the analysis. Model fitting of the peripheral blood count data of 1000 simulated healthy patients whose blood count parameters were within their respective normal ranges over time yielded baseline variability of hematopoietic kinetic parameters (Figure 1). Two main groups of MDS patients could be identified from model fitting: MDS 1 and MDS 2, both of which could be best distinguished from the simulated healthy patients based on the parameter for the rate of megakaryocytic differentiation. MDS 1 and MDS 2 also had distinct parameters for the rates of hematopoietic progenitor proliferation, describing two different phenotypes of disease activity. The red blood cell count of a representative patient in MDS 1 is shown in Figure 2, where application of the Akaike information criterion identified the most likely time point when the hematopoietic kinetic parameters accounting for the peripheral red blood cell count changed after initiation of azacitidine. This time point preceded proven disease progression by 40 days. Conclusion: Parameterization of hematopoiesis with a model that can infer the kinetics of hematopoietic compartments in the bone marrow provides a powerful tool for measuring ineffective hematopoiesis in MDS patients. The resulting kinetic parameters can identify distinct groups of MDS patients based on the phenotype of their disease. The next step would be to correlate the different kinetic parameters distinguishing these groups to their disease genotypes using next-generation sequencing. On an individual patient level, these parameters can identify the most likely time when the disease phenotype changes. The development of a dynamic score predicting the change in disease activity based on hematopoietic kinetic parameters derived from peripheral blood count data over time is ongoing. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.313 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicAcute Myeloid Leukemia Research→French-language works237,207→