Flexible Design: Revisionary Poetics in Blake’s Vala or The Four Zoas by John B. Pierce
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
ESC 26, 2000 is true for radicals or reformists like Phebe Gibbes, John Trusler (now, there is a new discovery for most of London’s readers!), and Robert Bage. In its exhilaratingly intelligent close readings of texts, and in its command of a broad sweep of argument, this book rearranges familiar landmarks in a manner that will be felt for some time to come. ISOBEL GRUNDY / University o f Alberta John B. Pierce. Flexible Design: Revisionary Poetics in Blake’s Vala or The Four Zoas. Montreal, Kingston, London, Buffalo: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 1998. xxvii, 206. 9 plates. John Pierce’s analysis of Blake’s most difficult poem is a worthy contribution about a much-studied work.1 The title derives from his argument that in Vala, Blake’s shifting of narrative strategies gives the poem a flexible de sign, one whose [... ] outline gains its flexibility through con scious adaptations of sequential disruptions as a fundamental element in narrative experiment. [... ] the poem is revised to enact its own meaning through emergent forms. [... ] Essen tially, however, I am interested in the fluidity and occasional uncertainties evidenced in revision, leaving the poem as a monument to process rather than product, (xxii, xxvi, xxi) His “critical approach here is driven primarily by the physi cal state of the manuscript” (xv), and he deals with its extraor dinary intricacy in exemplary though not very novel fashion. The problems are primarily to establish what the words of the poem axe (many of them are erased or deleted), where they be long (there are two sections called “Night the First” and none called “Night the Second” and two called “Night the Seventh”), and how the scores of illustrations are related to the poem (the proof-engravings for Young’s Night Thoughts and several of the drawings are probably not related to the poem at all2). Its meaning exists in the stages of development of the poem, not in its organic unity. This supposition has been too little registered in the field of Blake criticism, and it is this suppo sition the book attempts to explore, (xxvi) 502 REVIEWS Of course the pattern he traces was not the one Blake orig inally intended. Blake gradually altered the shape of the poem and its es sential narrative poetics to highlight the discontinuous, the indeterminate, and the synchronic. [... ] the synoptic and synchronic tendencies of Blake’s poetics are the result of con scious revision and correction of an essentially diachronic nar rative. (xvii-xviii) Pierce therefore claims that the discontinuities in the text are deliberate, that they indicate a change in Blake’s plan, or rather a growing insistence that the idea of natural cause-andeffect is a Newtonian delusion. As Blake wrote in Milton, “every Natural Effect has a Spiritual Cause, and Not A Natural: for a Natural Cause only seems: it is a Delusion.”3 And in his notes to Bacon’s Essays he exclaimed: “There is no Such Things as [... ] a Natural Cause for any Thing in any Way” (Marginalium [71798] to Bacon’s Essays [1798], 75). Of course such a belief makes a narrative poem impossible, for its events do not produce one another in a natural way. Pierce argues plausibly that Blake began writing a narrative poem, and then, when he came to believe that its method, its narrative character, belied its purpose, or what had become its purpose, he disrupted it with interpolations that fundamentally altered its narrative character. There may once have been a “story” in Vala, but, by the time it had become The Four Zoas, the story was in tatters, and the disruptions to the continuity were often more conspicuous than the “narrative.” This is an argument of very considerable significance and one that is very illuminating not only of The Four Zoas (179671807 ?) but also of Milton (1804[— 1811?]) and Jerusalem (1804[1820 ?]), which overlapped with and succeeded The Four Zoas. Blake’s earlier long poems, from Tiriel (71789) to Europe (1794) and The Book of Urizen (1794), are manifestly narrative po ems, although the worlds they deal with are only occasionally the natural world and although the spiritual histories they de pict are occasionally disconcerting. But events...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».