320. PEDIATRIC OPEN-LABEL CLINICAL STUDY OF RITUXIMAB FOR THE TREATMENT OF GRANULOMATOSIS WITH POLYANGIITIS AND MICROSCOPIC POLYANGIITIS
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background: PePRS is a Phase IIa international, multicenter, open-label single arm study of rituximab in pediatric patients (pts) with newly diagnosed or relapsing granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA) or microscopic polyangiitis (MPA). Methods: Pts aged ⩾2 to ⩽ 18 years with recurrence or new onset of potentially organ- or life-threatening disease were included. Pts with severe disease requiring mechanical ventilation due to alveolar hemorrhage, plasmapheresis or hemodialysis at screening were excluded. Pulsed intravenous (IV) methylprednisolone (3 doses) were administered during the screening period followed by 4 weekly IV rituximab infusions of 375 mg/m2 and concomitant oral glucocorticoid taper. After the 6-mo remission induction phase, pts received standard of care treatment (including additional rituximab infusions if required) for disease control. Visits occurred at 1, 2, 4 and 6 mos and every 3 mos thereafter for at least 18 mos. The pediatric vasculitis activity score (PVAS) was used for exploratory efficacy assessments. Remission was defined as a PVAS of 0 and oral prednisone or prednisolone equivalent dose of ⩽ 0.2 mg/kg/day (max 10 mg/day). Results: Of the 25 pts enrolled from 11 centers, 19 (76%) had GPA and 6 (24%) had MPA. Most were female (20 pts [80%]), white (17 pts [68%]), with a median (range) age was 14 (6-17) years. Most pts (18/25) had new-onset disease. Median baseline PVAS was 8 (IQR 5-15). Median (range) duration of follow-up was 24 (16-54) mos. All 25 pts completed the first 4 rituximab infusions and the 6-mo remission induction phase; 24 of 25 completed ⩾18 mos of follow-up. All pts had ⩾ 1 adverse event (AE) during the first 6 mos; infusion-related reactions (IRRs) were the most common (Table). IRRs occurred in 32% of pts with the first infusion and were less frequent thereafter. Overall, infections occurred in 68% of pts (upper respiratory tract infection was the most frequent [16% of pts]). Ten serious AEs (SAEs) occurred in 7 pts during the 6-mo remission induction phase, including 1 IRR. Over the entire study, 27 SAEs occurred in 12 pts; no deaths were reported. Exploratory efficacy assessment showed 56% of pts achieved PVAS remission by mo 6, 92% by mo 12 and 100% by mo 18. Mean (range) duration of remission was 72 (7-193) wks. Conclusion: In this first global clinical trial of rituximab in pediatric pts with GPA/MPA, rituximab was well tolerated with an overall safety profile comparable to rituximab-treated adults with GPA/MPA. No new safety signals were observed. All patients achieved remission by 18 mos. Disclosures: P. Brogan – grant/research support: Roche, SOBI, Novartis, Chemocentryx; consultant: Roche, SOBI, UCB; speakers bureau: SOBI, Novartis. G. Cleary – speakers bureau: AbbVie. O. Kasapcoput & S. Rangaraj – none declared. R. Yeung – consultant: Novartis, Eli Lilly. P. Brunetta – employee of Genentech (at the time of the study). J. Cooper – Genentech clinical research fellow (at the time of the study). P. Kirchner, P. Pordeli & P. Lehane – employees of Roche. This study was funded by F. Hoffmann-LaRoche Ltd and Genentech, Inc. Third-party writing assistance was furnished by Health Interactions, Inc. Common Adverse Events Reported in ≥ 10% of Patients During Remission Induction Phase AE, adverse event.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».