MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

320. PEDIATRIC OPEN-LABEL CLINICAL STUDY OF RITUXIMAB FOR THE TREATMENT OF GRANULOMATOSIS WITH POLYANGIITIS AND MICROSCOPIC POLYANGIITIS

2019· article· en· W2931208441 on OpenAlexaff
Paul Brogan, Gavin Cleary, Aimee O. Hersh, Özgür Kasapçopur, Satyapal Rangaraj, Rae S. M. Yeung, Andrew Zeft, Petra Kirchner, Paul Brunetta, Jennifer C. Cooper, Pooneh Pordeli, Patricia B. Lehane

Bibliographic record

VenueLara D. Veeken · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVasculitis and related conditions
Canadian institutionsRoche (Canada)Hospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineGranulomatosis with polyangiitisRituximabMicroscopic polyangiitisDermatologyVasculitisPathologyLymphomaDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: PePRS is a Phase IIa international, multicenter, open-label single arm study of rituximab in pediatric patients (pts) with newly diagnosed or relapsing granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA) or microscopic polyangiitis (MPA). Methods: Pts aged ⩾2 to ⩽ 18 years with recurrence or new onset of potentially organ- or life-threatening disease were included. Pts with severe disease requiring mechanical ventilation due to alveolar hemorrhage, plasmapheresis or hemodialysis at screening were excluded. Pulsed intravenous (IV) methylprednisolone (3 doses) were administered during the screening period followed by 4 weekly IV rituximab infusions of 375 mg/m2 and concomitant oral glucocorticoid taper. After the 6-mo remission induction phase, pts received standard of care treatment (including additional rituximab infusions if required) for disease control. Visits occurred at 1, 2, 4 and 6 mos and every 3 mos thereafter for at least 18 mos. The pediatric vasculitis activity score (PVAS) was used for exploratory efficacy assessments. Remission was defined as a PVAS of 0 and oral prednisone or prednisolone equivalent dose of ⩽ 0.2 mg/kg/day (max 10 mg/day). Results: Of the 25 pts enrolled from 11 centers, 19 (76%) had GPA and 6 (24%) had MPA. Most were female (20 pts [80%]), white (17 pts [68%]), with a median (range) age was 14 (6-17) years. Most pts (18/25) had new-onset disease. Median baseline PVAS was 8 (IQR 5-15). Median (range) duration of follow-up was 24 (16-54) mos. All 25 pts completed the first 4 rituximab infusions and the 6-mo remission induction phase; 24 of 25 completed ⩾18 mos of follow-up. All pts had ⩾ 1 adverse event (AE) during the first 6 mos; infusion-related reactions (IRRs) were the most common (Table). IRRs occurred in 32% of pts with the first infusion and were less frequent thereafter. Overall, infections occurred in 68% of pts (upper respiratory tract infection was the most frequent [16% of pts]). Ten serious AEs (SAEs) occurred in 7 pts during the 6-mo remission induction phase, including 1 IRR. Over the entire study, 27 SAEs occurred in 12 pts; no deaths were reported. Exploratory efficacy assessment showed 56% of pts achieved PVAS remission by mo 6, 92% by mo 12 and 100% by mo 18. Mean (range) duration of remission was 72 (7-193) wks. Conclusion: In this first global clinical trial of rituximab in pediatric pts with GPA/MPA, rituximab was well tolerated with an overall safety profile comparable to rituximab-treated adults with GPA/MPA. No new safety signals were observed. All patients achieved remission by 18 mos. Disclosures: P. Brogan – grant/research support: Roche, SOBI, Novartis, Chemocentryx; consultant: Roche, SOBI, UCB; speakers bureau: SOBI, Novartis. G. Cleary – speakers bureau: AbbVie. O. Kasapcoput & S. Rangaraj – none declared. R. Yeung – consultant: Novartis, Eli Lilly. P. Brunetta – employee of Genentech (at the time of the study). J. Cooper – Genentech clinical research fellow (at the time of the study). P. Kirchner, P. Pordeli & P. Lehane – employees of Roche. This study was funded by F. Hoffmann-LaRoche Ltd and Genentech, Inc. Third-party writing assistance was furnished by Health Interactions, Inc. Common Adverse Events Reported in ≥ 10% of Patients During Remission Induction Phase AE, adverse event.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLara D. VeekenSame topicVasculitis and related conditionsFrench-language works237,207