MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2932275070 · doi:10.1353/esc.2001.0032

Here is Queer: Nationalisms and Sexualities and the Literatures of Canada by Peter Dickinson

2001· article· en· W2932275070 sur OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Terry Goldie

Notice bibliographique

RevueEnglish studies in Canada · 2001
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueCanadian Identity and History
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésQueerHuman sexualityReading (process)HistoryHegemonySociologyMedia studiesGender studiesLawPolitical sciencePolitics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

REVIEWS Peter Dickinson. Here is Queer: Nationalisms and Sexualities and the Literatures of Canada. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1999. 262. $19.95 paper. “In the interests of full disclosure,” as the journalists say, I am listed on the acknowledgments page of this book, and I was in fact the external examiner when it was presented as a dissertation at the University of British Columbia. I am sure that there are many among you who will now stop reading, on the grounds that what follows is so tainted as to be useless as a review. All I can offer in justification is that what might be called “Canlit gaycrit” is a small field, and the list of usual suspects is not long. After I agreed to review this book for English Studies in Canada, I was asked to do the same by three other journals. Part of the problem is, of course, the limited view that the hegemony of the majority always has of the minority (“We wanted a black woman on the panel but we asked her and she wouldn’t come.”) But this is also just one more example of the usual Canadian trajectory. First a minority is noticed sociolog­ ically in the United States. Then it is noticed in Canada. Then it is noticed as a factor in American literary studies. Then it is noticed as a factor in Canadian literary studies. Then critics who identify as part of that minority start making noise in the American literary academy (read MLA). Then critics who iden­ tify as part of that minority start making noise in the Canadian literary academy (read ACCUTE). Then it reaches the study of Canadian literature. This might seem an overly cynical view. Still, the conser­ vatism of the study of Canadian literature remains striking, especially when Canadian literature itself is often so adventur­ ous. There are obvious exceptions to this conservatism, often feminist, but they are just that, exceptions. The time when the study of Canadian literature seemed avant garde was a time when Canadian nationalism was itselfavant garde. Today, when Canadian nationalism seems a tired residue maintained by that aging WASPish group, The Council of Canadians, the staidness of the study of Canadian literature just seems a natural fit. Lest anyone get the wrong idea, I am not a kettle casting aspersions at pots. I was part of the rise of nationalism in the 521 ESC 27, 2001 late sixties, I have been teaching and writing about Canadian literature since the early seventies, and I continue to give money to The Council of Canadians. But this does not delude me into thinking that Canlitcrit is part of the cutting edge. This increases the importance ofcritics such as Arun Mukherjee and Rinaldo Walcott, prominent among the growing num­ ber who are putting race in the foreground of the study of Cana­ dian literature. And to this I would add the present volume. The blurbs on the back of the book present the usual hyperbole (“revolutionize Canadian literary studies” is a bit much), but phrases such as “first of its kind” and “fresh and challenging” are certainly appropriate. Dickinson’s book takes various recent studies of nationalism (most notably Homi Bhabha), blends them with similar works on sexuality (most notably Judith Butler), and applies them to contemporary Canadian literature. Dickinson does not “queer Canlit,” in the sense of looking at a variety of texts and show­ ing gay and lesbian aporia, but rather examines the canonically gay and lesbian stars of contemporary literature, such as Timo­ thy Findley, Scott Symons, and Michel Tremblay, and Daphne Marlatt and Nicole Brossard. The title might be a bit misleading to some. It represents a new take on Northrop Frye’s statement of Canadian existential angst: “Where is here?” Dickinson is not making an opposi­ tional statement such as that of Queer Nation but rather is performing explorations. It is not “We’re here. We’re queer,” but “Is there something to this ‘queer’ literature that explains something?” Dickinson is suggesting that these sexual fringes perhaps reveal the meaning of Canada better than culture that appears to be closer to the centre. It is an interesting thesis, one...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,119
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,494

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,009
Tête enseignante GPT0,233
Écart entre enseignants0,224 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2001
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueEnglish studies in CanadaMême sujetCanadian Identity and HistoryTravaux en français237 207