Here is Queer: Nationalisms and Sexualities and the Literatures of Canada by Peter Dickinson
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
REVIEWS Peter Dickinson. Here is Queer: Nationalisms and Sexualities and the Literatures of Canada. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1999. 262. $19.95 paper. “In the interests of full disclosure,” as the journalists say, I am listed on the acknowledgments page of this book, and I was in fact the external examiner when it was presented as a dissertation at the University of British Columbia. I am sure that there are many among you who will now stop reading, on the grounds that what follows is so tainted as to be useless as a review. All I can offer in justification is that what might be called “Canlit gaycrit” is a small field, and the list of usual suspects is not long. After I agreed to review this book for English Studies in Canada, I was asked to do the same by three other journals. Part of the problem is, of course, the limited view that the hegemony of the majority always has of the minority (“We wanted a black woman on the panel but we asked her and she wouldn’t come.”) But this is also just one more example of the usual Canadian trajectory. First a minority is noticed sociolog ically in the United States. Then it is noticed in Canada. Then it is noticed as a factor in American literary studies. Then it is noticed as a factor in Canadian literary studies. Then critics who identify as part of that minority start making noise in the American literary academy (read MLA). Then critics who iden tify as part of that minority start making noise in the Canadian literary academy (read ACCUTE). Then it reaches the study of Canadian literature. This might seem an overly cynical view. Still, the conser vatism of the study of Canadian literature remains striking, especially when Canadian literature itself is often so adventur ous. There are obvious exceptions to this conservatism, often feminist, but they are just that, exceptions. The time when the study of Canadian literature seemed avant garde was a time when Canadian nationalism was itselfavant garde. Today, when Canadian nationalism seems a tired residue maintained by that aging WASPish group, The Council of Canadians, the staidness of the study of Canadian literature just seems a natural fit. Lest anyone get the wrong idea, I am not a kettle casting aspersions at pots. I was part of the rise of nationalism in the 521 ESC 27, 2001 late sixties, I have been teaching and writing about Canadian literature since the early seventies, and I continue to give money to The Council of Canadians. But this does not delude me into thinking that Canlitcrit is part of the cutting edge. This increases the importance ofcritics such as Arun Mukherjee and Rinaldo Walcott, prominent among the growing num ber who are putting race in the foreground of the study of Cana dian literature. And to this I would add the present volume. The blurbs on the back of the book present the usual hyperbole (“revolutionize Canadian literary studies” is a bit much), but phrases such as “first of its kind” and “fresh and challenging” are certainly appropriate. Dickinson’s book takes various recent studies of nationalism (most notably Homi Bhabha), blends them with similar works on sexuality (most notably Judith Butler), and applies them to contemporary Canadian literature. Dickinson does not “queer Canlit,” in the sense of looking at a variety of texts and show ing gay and lesbian aporia, but rather examines the canonically gay and lesbian stars of contemporary literature, such as Timo thy Findley, Scott Symons, and Michel Tremblay, and Daphne Marlatt and Nicole Brossard. The title might be a bit misleading to some. It represents a new take on Northrop Frye’s statement of Canadian existential angst: “Where is here?” Dickinson is not making an opposi tional statement such as that of Queer Nation but rather is performing explorations. It is not “We’re here. We’re queer,” but “Is there something to this ‘queer’ literature that explains something?” Dickinson is suggesting that these sexual fringes perhaps reveal the meaning of Canada better than culture that appears to be closer to the centre. It is an interesting thesis, one...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».