MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2932275070 · doi:10.1353/esc.2001.0032

Here is Queer: Nationalisms and Sexualities and the Literatures of Canada by Peter Dickinson

2001· article· en· W2932275070 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Terry Goldie

Bibliographic record

VenueEnglish studies in Canada · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQueerHuman sexualityReading (process)HistoryHegemonySociologyMedia studiesGender studiesLawPolitical sciencePolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

REVIEWS Peter Dickinson. Here is Queer: Nationalisms and Sexualities and the Literatures of Canada. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1999. 262. $19.95 paper. “In the interests of full disclosure,” as the journalists say, I am listed on the acknowledgments page of this book, and I was in fact the external examiner when it was presented as a dissertation at the University of British Columbia. I am sure that there are many among you who will now stop reading, on the grounds that what follows is so tainted as to be useless as a review. All I can offer in justification is that what might be called “Canlit gaycrit” is a small field, and the list of usual suspects is not long. After I agreed to review this book for English Studies in Canada, I was asked to do the same by three other journals. Part of the problem is, of course, the limited view that the hegemony of the majority always has of the minority (“We wanted a black woman on the panel but we asked her and she wouldn’t come.”) But this is also just one more example of the usual Canadian trajectory. First a minority is noticed sociolog­ ically in the United States. Then it is noticed in Canada. Then it is noticed as a factor in American literary studies. Then it is noticed as a factor in Canadian literary studies. Then critics who identify as part of that minority start making noise in the American literary academy (read MLA). Then critics who iden­ tify as part of that minority start making noise in the Canadian literary academy (read ACCUTE). Then it reaches the study of Canadian literature. This might seem an overly cynical view. Still, the conser­ vatism of the study of Canadian literature remains striking, especially when Canadian literature itself is often so adventur­ ous. There are obvious exceptions to this conservatism, often feminist, but they are just that, exceptions. The time when the study of Canadian literature seemed avant garde was a time when Canadian nationalism was itselfavant garde. Today, when Canadian nationalism seems a tired residue maintained by that aging WASPish group, The Council of Canadians, the staidness of the study of Canadian literature just seems a natural fit. Lest anyone get the wrong idea, I am not a kettle casting aspersions at pots. I was part of the rise of nationalism in the 521 ESC 27, 2001 late sixties, I have been teaching and writing about Canadian literature since the early seventies, and I continue to give money to The Council of Canadians. But this does not delude me into thinking that Canlitcrit is part of the cutting edge. This increases the importance ofcritics such as Arun Mukherjee and Rinaldo Walcott, prominent among the growing num­ ber who are putting race in the foreground of the study of Cana­ dian literature. And to this I would add the present volume. The blurbs on the back of the book present the usual hyperbole (“revolutionize Canadian literary studies” is a bit much), but phrases such as “first of its kind” and “fresh and challenging” are certainly appropriate. Dickinson’s book takes various recent studies of nationalism (most notably Homi Bhabha), blends them with similar works on sexuality (most notably Judith Butler), and applies them to contemporary Canadian literature. Dickinson does not “queer Canlit,” in the sense of looking at a variety of texts and show­ ing gay and lesbian aporia, but rather examines the canonically gay and lesbian stars of contemporary literature, such as Timo­ thy Findley, Scott Symons, and Michel Tremblay, and Daphne Marlatt and Nicole Brossard. The title might be a bit misleading to some. It represents a new take on Northrop Frye’s statement of Canadian existential angst: “Where is here?” Dickinson is not making an opposi­ tional statement such as that of Queer Nation but rather is performing explorations. It is not “We’re here. We’re queer,” but “Is there something to this ‘queer’ literature that explains something?” Dickinson is suggesting that these sexual fringes perhaps reveal the meaning of Canada better than culture that appears to be closer to the centre. It is an interesting thesis, one...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.119
Threshold uncertainty score0.494

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnglish studies in CanadaSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207