MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2932611411 · doi:10.1353/esc.2000.0019

Selected Prose of Christina Rossetti ed. by David A. Kent, P. G. Stanwood

2000· article· en· W2932611411 sur OpenAlexvenueno aff
Mary Wilson Carpenter

Notice bibliographique

RevueEnglish studies in Canada · 2000
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiquePoetry Analysis and Criticism
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPoetryMemoirScholarshipBiographyBrotherLiteratureArtReading (process)Art historyHistoryPhilosophySociologyLaw

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

ESC 26, 2000 David A. Kent and P. G. Stanwood, eds. Selected Prose of Christina Rossetti. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1998. 404. David A. Kent and P. G. Stanwood have made an invaluable contribution to Christina Rossetti scholarship with this volume. Included in it are complete versions of Maude, Prose & Verse (1850) and Speaking Likenesses (1874), as well as selections from Commonplace, and Other Short Stories (1870), and two brief fictional “sketches” (1882). Selected Prose thus reprints in one volume a large proportion of the poet’s fictional works, which, if reprinted at all, have appeared in scattered collec­ tions. It also includes excerpts from five works of devotional prose: Annus Domini (1874), Seek and Find (1879), Called to be Saints (1881), Letter and Spirit (1883), Time Flies (1885), and The Face of the Deep (1892). Finally, it makes available such little-read texts as Rossetti’s contributions to the Imperial Dictionary of Universal Biography (1857-63) on Leopardi and Petrarch, magazine articles on Dante (1867, 1884), and an af­ fectionate memoir of her brother, “The House of Dante Gabriel Rossetti” (1892). The reprinting of these texts and excerpts re­ presenting her poetry in contexts unfamiliar to most readers but crucial to the reading of the poet and her oeuvre makes Christina Georgina Rossetti new to us. As the editors note, following the complete scholarly edi­ tion of her poetry edited by Rebecca Crump and published by Louisana State University Press in 1979, Christina Rossetti “has emerged from comparative critical obscurity in the last two decades of the twentieth century.” I would call it more of an ex­ plosion: it is only the rare undergraduate student in my thirdand fourth-year seminar in Victorian literature who has not al­ ready been introduced to her poetry, especially the perennially popular “Goblin Market.” In 1994 a double issue of Victorian Poetry was devoted to her work, and the list of critical and scholarly studies of Christina Rossetti grows steadily every year. She has indeed emerged — emerged, along with Emily Bronte and Elizabeth Barrett Browning, as one of the three “canonical” Victorian women poets who now balance Tennyson, Browning, and Arnold in the Victorian literature curriculum. 230 REVIEWS But as Kent and Stanwood also note, “[w]hat remains con­ spicuously absent from readily available printed sources is a selection of her prose works” (1). As a result, critical studies based on or drawing on her prose have been “minimal” (n3, 373). This carefully chosen and beautifully edited selection of the prose works, which should be acquired by every Rossetti student as well as every research library, should change the face of Rossetti scholarship. In contrast with the equally important scholarly edition of Rossetti’s letters edited by Antony H. Har­ rison, this volume makes available Rossetti’s “other” creative literature. Long devalued as either mediocre fiction or pious meditations, it is more properly seen as significantly “other” to her poetry, especially as it manifests the forms taken by her imagination when that form was not exclusively poetic. The prose also demonstrates Rossetti’s status and identity as a professional. Much of the fiction was clearly written as a sort of flyer into other professional waters to test whether she could find a new market with a new form of literary production. The sheer quantity of devotional prose — which has necessitated stringent editorial selection — should remind us that Rossetti, like many other Victorian women, found publishers more open to women’s religious writing because it sold well. And while it conformed to Rossetti’s beliefs about her duties as a Christian, it also provided her with perhaps the least restrictive and most labor-efficient form of writing. Her “devotional prose” could be whatever she wanted it to be — short meditations, passing inspi­ rations, little bursts of poetry, even bits of political commentary. Formal structures for such writing were exceedingly loose and easy. Not only could such work be turned out relatively quickly, but many glittering shards and fragments of poetic imagination that the poet might have edited out of a poem were never swept out of the less carefully ordered devotional prose. Space permits mention of only a few of the revelations to...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,336
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,015
Tête enseignante GPT0,232
Écart entre enseignants0,217 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2000
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueEnglish studies in CanadaMême sujetPoetry Analysis and CriticismTravaux en français237 207