MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2932611411 · doi:10.1353/esc.2000.0019

Selected Prose of Christina Rossetti ed. by David A. Kent, P. G. Stanwood

2000· article· en· W2932611411 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Mary Wilson Carpenter

Bibliographic record

VenueEnglish studies in Canada · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicPoetry Analysis and Criticism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoetryMemoirScholarshipBiographyBrotherLiteratureArtReading (process)Art historyHistoryPhilosophySociologyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ESC 26, 2000 David A. Kent and P. G. Stanwood, eds. Selected Prose of Christina Rossetti. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1998. 404. David A. Kent and P. G. Stanwood have made an invaluable contribution to Christina Rossetti scholarship with this volume. Included in it are complete versions of Maude, Prose & Verse (1850) and Speaking Likenesses (1874), as well as selections from Commonplace, and Other Short Stories (1870), and two brief fictional “sketches” (1882). Selected Prose thus reprints in one volume a large proportion of the poet’s fictional works, which, if reprinted at all, have appeared in scattered collec­ tions. It also includes excerpts from five works of devotional prose: Annus Domini (1874), Seek and Find (1879), Called to be Saints (1881), Letter and Spirit (1883), Time Flies (1885), and The Face of the Deep (1892). Finally, it makes available such little-read texts as Rossetti’s contributions to the Imperial Dictionary of Universal Biography (1857-63) on Leopardi and Petrarch, magazine articles on Dante (1867, 1884), and an af­ fectionate memoir of her brother, “The House of Dante Gabriel Rossetti” (1892). The reprinting of these texts and excerpts re­ presenting her poetry in contexts unfamiliar to most readers but crucial to the reading of the poet and her oeuvre makes Christina Georgina Rossetti new to us. As the editors note, following the complete scholarly edi­ tion of her poetry edited by Rebecca Crump and published by Louisana State University Press in 1979, Christina Rossetti “has emerged from comparative critical obscurity in the last two decades of the twentieth century.” I would call it more of an ex­ plosion: it is only the rare undergraduate student in my thirdand fourth-year seminar in Victorian literature who has not al­ ready been introduced to her poetry, especially the perennially popular “Goblin Market.” In 1994 a double issue of Victorian Poetry was devoted to her work, and the list of critical and scholarly studies of Christina Rossetti grows steadily every year. She has indeed emerged — emerged, along with Emily Bronte and Elizabeth Barrett Browning, as one of the three “canonical” Victorian women poets who now balance Tennyson, Browning, and Arnold in the Victorian literature curriculum. 230 REVIEWS But as Kent and Stanwood also note, “[w]hat remains con­ spicuously absent from readily available printed sources is a selection of her prose works” (1). As a result, critical studies based on or drawing on her prose have been “minimal” (n3, 373). This carefully chosen and beautifully edited selection of the prose works, which should be acquired by every Rossetti student as well as every research library, should change the face of Rossetti scholarship. In contrast with the equally important scholarly edition of Rossetti’s letters edited by Antony H. Har­ rison, this volume makes available Rossetti’s “other” creative literature. Long devalued as either mediocre fiction or pious meditations, it is more properly seen as significantly “other” to her poetry, especially as it manifests the forms taken by her imagination when that form was not exclusively poetic. The prose also demonstrates Rossetti’s status and identity as a professional. Much of the fiction was clearly written as a sort of flyer into other professional waters to test whether she could find a new market with a new form of literary production. The sheer quantity of devotional prose — which has necessitated stringent editorial selection — should remind us that Rossetti, like many other Victorian women, found publishers more open to women’s religious writing because it sold well. And while it conformed to Rossetti’s beliefs about her duties as a Christian, it also provided her with perhaps the least restrictive and most labor-efficient form of writing. Her “devotional prose” could be whatever she wanted it to be — short meditations, passing inspi­ rations, little bursts of poetry, even bits of political commentary. Formal structures for such writing were exceedingly loose and easy. Not only could such work be turned out relatively quickly, but many glittering shards and fragments of poetic imagination that the poet might have edited out of a poem were never swept out of the less carefully ordered devotional prose. Space permits mention of only a few of the revelations to...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.336
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnglish studies in CanadaSame topicPoetry Analysis and CriticismFrench-language works237,207