Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Role of English in Indian literature is a curious cultural phenomenon, but English is not an Indian language.It is the language of England, Ireland, Australia, Canada, and the USA.India has several sophisticated literary languages.The languages have long -standing literary traditions.Many students of other Countries think that India has no literature other than that written in English.It is assumed English is the main literary language in India because it has been given the status of "official language" by the Indian Constitution.In reality, Indian English literature is the newest developed branch of Indian literature.For an Indian writing in English involves a conflict between the mother tongue and English, this other tongue which has been our intimate enemy during the last two centuries.English was introduced as a medium of instruction into the Indian education system in 1835 by Lord Macaulay.The British rules of of India saw it as an intellectual tool to be used to civilize the natives.When English literature was included in school and University Courses, India already had a long and rich tradition of literature at the juncture of this encounter was being written in more than a dozen living languages, but since in English literature was produced in the country of the rulers, and was praised by them, it immediately acquired a high cultural status in India.Indian culture has been eclectic in the extreme.It has had a long tradition of receiving foreign influences.The English term culture is not sufficiently large to cover the semantic scope of the cultural situation in India.The term pervasive traits of a class or a section in a given society.Terms like Elite culture or Middleclass culture are efficient and adequate to describe the true cultural character groups.Speaking of multicultural context with reference to Indian literature is different in some important ways from speaking of it in the context of other post-colonial literatures in English.In India there has been such a complex inter relationship between various social, linguistic, racial and religious cultures, and these distinguishable sub cultures are so numerous, that it is virtually impossible to fit them in a common formula of sociological linguistic or ethnic cultural structure.We should not compare simple multicultural contexts and complex multicultural contexts.It is rather to compare complex and confusingly complicated contexts.Such complications are inevitable in a society that speaks nearly 80 languages, writes it"s literature in nearly 20 different languages, has a history of large-scale social Abstract: India has several sophisticated literary languages.The languages have long standing literary traditions.English is assumed as the main literary language as it has been given the status of "official language" by Indian Constitution.Multiculturalism in Indian literature is different from other post-colonial literatures in English.The main objective of this paper is to probe the role of Multiculturalism in Indian English Literature.An Indian is inevitably bicultural and lives within a bilingual and multilingual cultural idiom.He is born with a skill to switch his cultural-code according to the needs of his social situation.He even lives within an organic and native social context.The traditional terms used in Indian languages that institutionalised these diverse pulls were "Marga" and "Desi".In India it is not possible to have a truly autonomous Indian English style.Metophorically speaking the body of modern Indian culture is draped in ancient shoes, a medieval gown and a modern hat.Multiculturalism should bring a new strength to a literature.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,004 | 0,005 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,014 | 0,016 |
| Communication savante | 0,010 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,008 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».