MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2935218632 · doi:10.1353/esc.2002.0021

Dystopian Fiction East and West: Universe of Terror and Trial by Erika Gottlieb

2002· article· en· W2935218632 sur OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Peter Buitenhuis

Notice bibliographique

RevueEnglish studies in Canada · 2002
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueThemes in Literature Analysis
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésDystopiaGloomHistoryPersecutionIntelligentsiaArt historyLiteratureArtPoliticsLawPolitical science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

REVIEWS Erika Gottlieb. Dystopian Fiction East and West: Universe of Terror and Trial. Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen’s Uni­ versity Press, 2001. 323. $12.95 paper, $75.00 cloth. In September 1945, Isaiah Berlin visited Moscow. It was the first time he had been in Russia since he had fled to England with his family in the face of secret police persecution in 1920. His Russian was still fluent, and in the brief thaw immediately after the end of World War II, he was able to meet and talk with some of the major Russian writers and intellectuals. He found them all gripped by fear. As Berlin’s biographer Michael Ignatieff relates: From his first night in Moscow [...] Isaiah was exposed to the atmosphere of gloom, shame and terror among ‘the scared’ ones who had managed to survive the Yezhovshchina, the whole-scale extermination of the Russian intelligentsia in 1937. In addition to the millions of ordinary people sent to labour camps or simply shot, the regime had exterminated the cultural élite [...]. By the time the killing and deporta­ tion were done, there was a vacant stillness in Russian culture, like a forest after an all-consuming fire. (136-37) The thaw soon ended, and Soviet writers were plunged back into isolation from the West until the Cold War was over. This is the climate in which the Eastern dystopian fiction that Erika Gottlieb discusses was written. As she points out, this litera­ ture is quite different from Western dystopias. Orwell, Huxley, Atwood, and the others were writing their books as a warn­ ing; Koestler, Grossman, Ribakov, and many others were writ­ ing about a fait accompli, with little hope that things would improve. More than half of Gottlieb’s book is devoted to the East­ ern writers — largely because most of those whom she discuss­ es are unknown to most Western readers. She has, necessarily, to devote a good deal of space to plot summary. This some­ times makes for heavy and, often, gloomy going. The atm o­ sphere of terror under which most of these novels were writ­ ten does not make for pleasant reading, particularly since the reader is haunted by the fact that the writers — often with great courage — wrote with the knowledge that their work could lead 761 ESC 28, 2002 to arrest, summ ary conviction, and either death or long impris­ onment in the Gulags Gottlieb claims that dystopian fiction “is a post Christian genre” and th at the hell on earth of dystopian societies “is not that far removed from Dante’s medieval dream-vision of Dis, the city of hell” (3). The purpose of both Dante and Western dystopian fiction writers is to warn readers against the sin of giving in to tem ptation — of sin on the one hand and totalitari­ anism on the other. Dystopian fiction, of course, moves beyond Dante’s hell to a state in which the core of individual mind and personality is destroyed by the elimination of love and family ties. “Ultimately,” Gottlieb writes, “by being relentlessly bom­ barded by state propaganda while also being deprived of pri­ vacy, and intim ate relationships, we may be deprived of the core of our being, our personal memory of the past” (12). After a brief survey of nineteenth-century precursors to mod­ ern dystopian fiction — especially the Grand Inquisitor section of Dostoevsky’s The Brothers Karamazov — Gottlieb moves to an analysis of Zam iatin’s We, the precursor of all the Western novels that Gottlieb deals with: Huxley’s Brave New World, Or­ well’s Nineteen Eighty-Four, Bradbury’s Fahrenheit 451, Vonnegut ’s Player Piano, and Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale. We was one of the earliest attacks on the cult of the machine and technology that was adopted by Lenin after the Bolsheviks came to power. Henry Ford’s production line and Taylor’s time and motion studies became the bases of Lenin’s desire to trans­ form the Soviet Union into an efficient industrial state. D-503, the protagonist of We, is a m athematician and space-ship de­ signer who is perfectly content in his subservience to this ma­ chine state until...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,738
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,844

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,026
Tête enseignante GPT0,206
Écart entre enseignants0,180 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2002
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueEnglish studies in CanadaMême sujetThemes in Literature AnalysisTravaux en français237 207