MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2935218632 · doi:10.1353/esc.2002.0021

Dystopian Fiction East and West: Universe of Terror and Trial by Erika Gottlieb

2002· article· en· W2935218632 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Peter Buitenhuis

Bibliographic record

VenueEnglish studies in Canada · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicThemes in Literature Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDystopiaGloomHistoryPersecutionIntelligentsiaArt historyLiteratureArtPoliticsLawPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

REVIEWS Erika Gottlieb. Dystopian Fiction East and West: Universe of Terror and Trial. Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen’s Uni­ versity Press, 2001. 323. $12.95 paper, $75.00 cloth. In September 1945, Isaiah Berlin visited Moscow. It was the first time he had been in Russia since he had fled to England with his family in the face of secret police persecution in 1920. His Russian was still fluent, and in the brief thaw immediately after the end of World War II, he was able to meet and talk with some of the major Russian writers and intellectuals. He found them all gripped by fear. As Berlin’s biographer Michael Ignatieff relates: From his first night in Moscow [...] Isaiah was exposed to the atmosphere of gloom, shame and terror among ‘the scared’ ones who had managed to survive the Yezhovshchina, the whole-scale extermination of the Russian intelligentsia in 1937. In addition to the millions of ordinary people sent to labour camps or simply shot, the regime had exterminated the cultural élite [...]. By the time the killing and deporta­ tion were done, there was a vacant stillness in Russian culture, like a forest after an all-consuming fire. (136-37) The thaw soon ended, and Soviet writers were plunged back into isolation from the West until the Cold War was over. This is the climate in which the Eastern dystopian fiction that Erika Gottlieb discusses was written. As she points out, this litera­ ture is quite different from Western dystopias. Orwell, Huxley, Atwood, and the others were writing their books as a warn­ ing; Koestler, Grossman, Ribakov, and many others were writ­ ing about a fait accompli, with little hope that things would improve. More than half of Gottlieb’s book is devoted to the East­ ern writers — largely because most of those whom she discuss­ es are unknown to most Western readers. She has, necessarily, to devote a good deal of space to plot summary. This some­ times makes for heavy and, often, gloomy going. The atm o­ sphere of terror under which most of these novels were writ­ ten does not make for pleasant reading, particularly since the reader is haunted by the fact that the writers — often with great courage — wrote with the knowledge that their work could lead 761 ESC 28, 2002 to arrest, summ ary conviction, and either death or long impris­ onment in the Gulags Gottlieb claims that dystopian fiction “is a post Christian genre” and th at the hell on earth of dystopian societies “is not that far removed from Dante’s medieval dream-vision of Dis, the city of hell” (3). The purpose of both Dante and Western dystopian fiction writers is to warn readers against the sin of giving in to tem ptation — of sin on the one hand and totalitari­ anism on the other. Dystopian fiction, of course, moves beyond Dante’s hell to a state in which the core of individual mind and personality is destroyed by the elimination of love and family ties. “Ultimately,” Gottlieb writes, “by being relentlessly bom­ barded by state propaganda while also being deprived of pri­ vacy, and intim ate relationships, we may be deprived of the core of our being, our personal memory of the past” (12). After a brief survey of nineteenth-century precursors to mod­ ern dystopian fiction — especially the Grand Inquisitor section of Dostoevsky’s The Brothers Karamazov — Gottlieb moves to an analysis of Zam iatin’s We, the precursor of all the Western novels that Gottlieb deals with: Huxley’s Brave New World, Or­ well’s Nineteen Eighty-Four, Bradbury’s Fahrenheit 451, Vonnegut ’s Player Piano, and Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale. We was one of the earliest attacks on the cult of the machine and technology that was adopted by Lenin after the Bolsheviks came to power. Henry Ford’s production line and Taylor’s time and motion studies became the bases of Lenin’s desire to trans­ form the Soviet Union into an efficient industrial state. D-503, the protagonist of We, is a m athematician and space-ship de­ signer who is perfectly content in his subservience to this ma­ chine state until...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.738
Threshold uncertainty score0.844

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnglish studies in CanadaSame topicThemes in Literature AnalysisFrench-language works237,207