MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2935788956 · doi:10.1093/schbul/sbz019.321

T41. SEX DIFFERENCES IN VERBAL MEMORY IN FIRST-EPISODE PSYCHOSIS AND HEALTHY CONTROLS

2019· article· en· W2935788956 sur OpenAlexaff
Gabriella Buck, Katie M. Lavigne, Carolina Makowski, Ridha Joober, Ashok Malla, Martín Lepage

Notice bibliographique

RevueSchizophrenia Bulletin · 2019
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueSchizophrenia research and treatment
Établissements canadiensDouglas Mental Health University InstituteMcGill University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPsychosisVerbal memoryPsychologyRecallSchizophrenia (object-oriented programming)Memory impairmentWechsler Adult Intelligence ScaleCognitionClinical psychologyAudiologyPsychiatryMedicine

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Verbal memory (VM) is one of the most affected cognitive domains in patients with schizophrenia and a robust predictor of functional outcome. There are well-documented sex differences in verbal memory in healthy individuals, which may be particularly pertinent to study in psychosis. For instance, in healthy individuals, women tend to have significantly better verbal memory performance relative to men. Given that male psychosis patients present with an earlier age of onset, more negative symptoms, and have poorer functional outcomes than women, consideration of sex differences may lead to a better understanding of VM impairment in psychosis and its wide-ranging effects on outcome. Studies of first-degree relatives of schizophrenia patients and those at clinical high-risk for psychosis demonstrate specific impairments in immediate but not delayed recall, suggesting that impaired immediate recall may be a marker for psychosis. Our aims were thus (1) to investigate sex differences in VM ability in first-episode psychosis (FEP) patients and controls, and (2) to distinguish between sub-domains of memory impairment in FEP in relation to sex differences, by examining both immediate and delayed recall performance. 437 FEP patients (301 males, 136 females; age range 14–35) and 138 (96 males, 42 females matched on age, sex, handedness, and socioeconomic status) were included. VM was calculated from the Logical Memory Subscales of the Wechsler Memory Scale (n=324) or a computerized VM task from the CogState Research Battery (n=251). Performance of the matched control group was used as normative data to derive z-scores for VM, as well as for immediate and delayed recall separately. Main effects of sex (males, females) and diagnostic group (patients, controls), as well as group × sex interactions, on VM were examined, covarying for battery version. No significant group × sex interactions were found with respect to memory performance, F(1,570)=0.64, p=0.43. Significant main effects of group and sex on VM were observed, where FEP patients performed worse than controls, F(1,570)=75.69, p<.001, and males performed worse than females, F(1,570)=31.70, p<.001. Analyzing VM subdomains separately, no significant group × sex interactions were found for either immediate or delayed recall. However, the same pattern of results emerged in terms of main effects, with patients performing worse than controls on both immediate, F(1,570)=85.37, p<.001, and delayed recall, F(1,570)=65.33, p<.001, and males performing worse than females on both immediate, F(1,570)=31.15, p<.001, and delayed recall, F(1,570)=34.55, p<.001. In accordance with past studies, we demonstrated that patients with FEP were more impaired than controls in VM, and that males performed worse than females. The lack of significant group × sex interactions suggests there is no additive effect of male sex and patient status that contributes to VM performance, highlighting the opportunity to characterize individual differences in memory ability that can be observed in healthy people to better delineate the nature of these deficits in schizophrenia. Further, the null effect of differences between immediate and delayed recall indicates that the impairments extend to both subdomains of VM in both FEP patients and healthy individuals. Without explicitly studying sex differences in schizophrenia, implementation of otherwise well-informed treatment strategies may inadvertently ignore meaningful differences in the presentation and course of psychosis between males and females, and ultimately hinder the development of more effective interventions. Future studies should examine whether sex differences in memory are also apparent in enduring psychosis.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,006
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,019

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0060,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,015
Tête enseignante GPT0,268
Écart entre enseignants0,253 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2019
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueSchizophrenia BulletinMême sujetSchizophrenia research and treatmentTravaux en français237 207