MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2935788956 · doi:10.1093/schbul/sbz019.321

T41. SEX DIFFERENCES IN VERBAL MEMORY IN FIRST-EPISODE PSYCHOSIS AND HEALTHY CONTROLS

2019· article· en· W2935788956 on OpenAlexaff
Gabriella Buck, Katie M. Lavigne, Carolina Makowski, Ridha Joober, Ashok Malla, Martín Lepage

Bibliographic record

VenueSchizophrenia Bulletin · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSchizophrenia research and treatment
Canadian institutionsDouglas Mental Health University InstituteMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychosisVerbal memoryPsychologyRecallSchizophrenia (object-oriented programming)Memory impairmentWechsler Adult Intelligence ScaleCognitionClinical psychologyAudiologyPsychiatryMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Verbal memory (VM) is one of the most affected cognitive domains in patients with schizophrenia and a robust predictor of functional outcome. There are well-documented sex differences in verbal memory in healthy individuals, which may be particularly pertinent to study in psychosis. For instance, in healthy individuals, women tend to have significantly better verbal memory performance relative to men. Given that male psychosis patients present with an earlier age of onset, more negative symptoms, and have poorer functional outcomes than women, consideration of sex differences may lead to a better understanding of VM impairment in psychosis and its wide-ranging effects on outcome. Studies of first-degree relatives of schizophrenia patients and those at clinical high-risk for psychosis demonstrate specific impairments in immediate but not delayed recall, suggesting that impaired immediate recall may be a marker for psychosis. Our aims were thus (1) to investigate sex differences in VM ability in first-episode psychosis (FEP) patients and controls, and (2) to distinguish between sub-domains of memory impairment in FEP in relation to sex differences, by examining both immediate and delayed recall performance. 437 FEP patients (301 males, 136 females; age range 14–35) and 138 (96 males, 42 females matched on age, sex, handedness, and socioeconomic status) were included. VM was calculated from the Logical Memory Subscales of the Wechsler Memory Scale (n=324) or a computerized VM task from the CogState Research Battery (n=251). Performance of the matched control group was used as normative data to derive z-scores for VM, as well as for immediate and delayed recall separately. Main effects of sex (males, females) and diagnostic group (patients, controls), as well as group × sex interactions, on VM were examined, covarying for battery version. No significant group × sex interactions were found with respect to memory performance, F(1,570)=0.64, p=0.43. Significant main effects of group and sex on VM were observed, where FEP patients performed worse than controls, F(1,570)=75.69, p<.001, and males performed worse than females, F(1,570)=31.70, p<.001. Analyzing VM subdomains separately, no significant group × sex interactions were found for either immediate or delayed recall. However, the same pattern of results emerged in terms of main effects, with patients performing worse than controls on both immediate, F(1,570)=85.37, p<.001, and delayed recall, F(1,570)=65.33, p<.001, and males performing worse than females on both immediate, F(1,570)=31.15, p<.001, and delayed recall, F(1,570)=34.55, p<.001. In accordance with past studies, we demonstrated that patients with FEP were more impaired than controls in VM, and that males performed worse than females. The lack of significant group × sex interactions suggests there is no additive effect of male sex and patient status that contributes to VM performance, highlighting the opportunity to characterize individual differences in memory ability that can be observed in healthy people to better delineate the nature of these deficits in schizophrenia. Further, the null effect of differences between immediate and delayed recall indicates that the impairments extend to both subdomains of VM in both FEP patients and healthy individuals. Without explicitly studying sex differences in schizophrenia, implementation of otherwise well-informed treatment strategies may inadvertently ignore meaningful differences in the presentation and course of psychosis between males and females, and ultimately hinder the development of more effective interventions. Future studies should examine whether sex differences in memory are also apparent in enduring psychosis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSchizophrenia BulletinSame topicSchizophrenia research and treatmentFrench-language works237,207