S21. THE IMPACT OF PERSISTENT NEGATIVE SYMPTOMS ON FUNCTIONING AND DEFEATIST BELIEFS IN YOUTH AT CLINICAL HIGH RISK FOR PSYCHOSIS
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Persistent negative symptoms (PNS) are defined as enduring moderate negative symptoms while controlling for principal sources of secondary negative symptoms. PNS symptoms have been associated with poor functional outcomes in schizophrenia. Furthermore, in schizophrenia negative symptoms and poor functioning have been reportedly associated with defeatist beliefs (e.g., “I always fail”). Youth at clinical high risk (CHR) for developing psychosis often demonstrate negative symptoms, poor functioning, and defeatist beliefs. The goal of this study was to determine if negative symptoms were associated with poor functioning and defeatist beliefs in a CHR longitudinal cohort. CHR (N=764) participants were recruited for the North American Prodrome Longitudinal Study (NAPLS 2) at 8-sites across North America. Negative symptoms were rated on the Scale of Prodromal Symptoms (SOPS) at baseline, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. For this study negative symptoms were restricted to social anhedonia (N1), avolition (N2), and expression of emotion (N3) based on recommendations from the NIMH-MATRICS consensus statement on negative symptoms. PNS were defined as having one of these three negative symptoms scored ≥4 (i.e., moderately severe to extreme) for a period of one year. Depressive symptoms were assessed with the Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS). To assess defeatist beliefs the Brief Core Schema Scale (BCSS) was utilized as a proxy to evaluate negative self-beliefs (e.g., “I am worthless”) and positive self-beliefs (e.g., “I am valuable”). Generalized linear mixed models for repeated measures were used to examine changes over time between and within groups to accommodate for missing data and account for intra-participant correlations. Sixty-seven CHR individuals had PNS. Mixed-effect models demonstrated that the PNS group had significant global, social, and role functioning deficits at baseline, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months compared to CHR individuals without PNS (n=673). Moreover, functioning did not improve in the PNS group while functioning in the group without PNS significantly improved over time. There were no significant differences between the groups on depressive symptoms with the CDSS. The PNS group had significantly higher BCSS self-negative beliefs at 12 and 24 months compared to the group without PNS. Individuals without PNS had significantly higher positive self-beliefs (e.g., “I am valuable”) at baseline, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months compared to the PNS group. The results indicate that in the NAPLS cohort 10% of CHR individuals have PNS. Moreover, the PNS group demonstrated significant and persistent global, social, and role functioning deficits compared to those without PNS. The group without PNS had higher levels of positive beliefs (e.g., “I am successful”), which may indicate a protective factor against developing PNS.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,005 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,031 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».