S21. THE IMPACT OF PERSISTENT NEGATIVE SYMPTOMS ON FUNCTIONING AND DEFEATIST BELIEFS IN YOUTH AT CLINICAL HIGH RISK FOR PSYCHOSIS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Persistent negative symptoms (PNS) are defined as enduring moderate negative symptoms while controlling for principal sources of secondary negative symptoms. PNS symptoms have been associated with poor functional outcomes in schizophrenia. Furthermore, in schizophrenia negative symptoms and poor functioning have been reportedly associated with defeatist beliefs (e.g., “I always fail”). Youth at clinical high risk (CHR) for developing psychosis often demonstrate negative symptoms, poor functioning, and defeatist beliefs. The goal of this study was to determine if negative symptoms were associated with poor functioning and defeatist beliefs in a CHR longitudinal cohort. CHR (N=764) participants were recruited for the North American Prodrome Longitudinal Study (NAPLS 2) at 8-sites across North America. Negative symptoms were rated on the Scale of Prodromal Symptoms (SOPS) at baseline, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. For this study negative symptoms were restricted to social anhedonia (N1), avolition (N2), and expression of emotion (N3) based on recommendations from the NIMH-MATRICS consensus statement on negative symptoms. PNS were defined as having one of these three negative symptoms scored ≥4 (i.e., moderately severe to extreme) for a period of one year. Depressive symptoms were assessed with the Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS). To assess defeatist beliefs the Brief Core Schema Scale (BCSS) was utilized as a proxy to evaluate negative self-beliefs (e.g., “I am worthless”) and positive self-beliefs (e.g., “I am valuable”). Generalized linear mixed models for repeated measures were used to examine changes over time between and within groups to accommodate for missing data and account for intra-participant correlations. Sixty-seven CHR individuals had PNS. Mixed-effect models demonstrated that the PNS group had significant global, social, and role functioning deficits at baseline, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months compared to CHR individuals without PNS (n=673). Moreover, functioning did not improve in the PNS group while functioning in the group without PNS significantly improved over time. There were no significant differences between the groups on depressive symptoms with the CDSS. The PNS group had significantly higher BCSS self-negative beliefs at 12 and 24 months compared to the group without PNS. Individuals without PNS had significantly higher positive self-beliefs (e.g., “I am valuable”) at baseline, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months compared to the PNS group. The results indicate that in the NAPLS cohort 10% of CHR individuals have PNS. Moreover, the PNS group demonstrated significant and persistent global, social, and role functioning deficits compared to those without PNS. The group without PNS had higher levels of positive beliefs (e.g., “I am successful”), which may indicate a protective factor against developing PNS.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.031 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".