F127. THE PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS: HOW HAPPINESS MEDIATES THE RELATION BETWEEN SHYNESS AND QUALITY OF LIFE AMONG ADULTS WITH SCHIZOPHRENIA
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Individual differences in temperament develop early in life and remain stable throughout adulthood. Those who are temperamentally shy are susceptible to impairments in several domains of adaptive functioning, including poor social skills, reduced quality of life (QoL), and higher rates of psychiatric disorders. Individual differences in premorbid temperamental shyness in childhood are known to portend reduced QoL in adults with schizophrenia (Goldberg & Schmidt, 2001). We also know that not all people with schizophrenia who are also temperamentally shy have reduced QoL. For example, recent studies have found evidence of biological moderators on the relation between temperamental shyness and QoL (Khalesi et al., 2018a,b). Relatively few studies, however, have examined factors that may link (i.e., mediate) the relation between individual differences in premorbid temperamental shyness and QoL among people with schizophrenia. One psychological well-being measure that may mediate this relation is level of trait happiness. The limited research on happiness among those with schizophrenia has been hypothesized to be due to the longstanding belief that anhedonia is an inherent feature of schizophrenia (Agid et al., 2012). Trait happiness refers to a subjective assessment of whether one is generally a happy or an unhappy person and is different from both subjective and objective QoL, which assess the presumed preconditions of happiness rather than the internally experienced perception of happiness itself (Diener, 1984; Lyubomersky & Lepper, 1997) and other positive personality traits such as optimism (Austin et al., 2005). As well, people who are temperamentally shy tend to report higher levels of negative than positive affect, suggesting lower trait happiness. To our knowledge, no study has examined whether one’s level of happiness mediates the relation between temperamental shyness and QoL in schizophrenia. Accordingly, the purpose of this study was to examine whether trait happiness mediated the relation between temperamental shyness and QoL in stable outpatient adults with schizophrenia. Participants were 95 stable outpatients with a primary diagnosis of schizophrenia or schizophrenia spectrum disorders (nschizophrenia = 41, nschizoaffective disorder = 30, nother = 24). The participants (59 male, Meanage = 48.5 years, SD = 11 years) completed the Subjective Happiness Scale, Cheek and Buss Shyness Scale, and the Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q). Analyses revealed that increases in shyness were associated with decreases in QoL (p < .05) in this sample, but this relation was no longer significant when happiness was entered into the model (p > .05), suggesting that trait happiness mediated the relation between shyness and QoL. These results suggest that lower levels of general or trait happiness may be a factor underlying the risk of poorer QoL outcomes in temperamentally shy adults with schizophrenia. These findings are consistent with the extant literature reporting that individual differences in temperamental factors and premorbid shy personality styles in childhood may play a role in psychological well-being and QoL in adulthood in individuals with schizophrenia. These findings may inform the development of novel psychosocial interventions for this population.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,007 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,024 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».