MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W293951202

The Making of a Chapter: THE SOUTHERN ONTARIO CHAPTER OF THE HYMN SOCIETY

2011· article· en· W293951202 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Lydia Pedersen

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe Hymn · 2011
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueCanadian Identity and History
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésHymnFaithArtSingingArt historyChorusHistoryEnthusiasmPerformance artTheologyLiteraturePhilosophyManagement
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Introduction On a sunny Sunday afternoon in October, 2008, Humbercrest United Church in Toronto's West End buzzed with anticipation. In die lofty chancel die Salvation Army Toronto Brass band took turns with guest organist Fred Graham in playing a boisterous halfhour prelude of hymn arrangements old and new as people filled die pews to enjoy a special hymn festival, Great hymns of the faith. Altiiough director of music Melvin Hurst conducts a similar festival every second year, this one was just a little more distinctive because it celebrated die tendi anniversary of SOCHS, die Soutiiern Ontario Chapter of die Hymn Society, which co-sponsored die event with die host church. The opening hymn, When in our music God is glorified,'' was a splendid introduction to our birtiiday party. Research for die narrators had been generously supplied by John Ambrose, editor of die hymnal Voices United and one of die founding members of SOCHS. The ministers and members of Humbercrest offered scripture readings, and die audience sang with enthusiasm hymns that ranged from Standing on die promises to die contemporary When we are living. A particularly proud moment in die program was die singing of die winning hymn of our recent first-ever competition. It had invited new texts based on die tiieme can we sing the Lord's song in a strange land? From fifty-seven submissions arising out of Canada, die USA, and Britain, adjudicators chose Stan Engle's How can we sing our songs of faitii? and runner-up Frederick Harrison's O how can we sing die Lord's song? Two lines from die latter summed up botii die hymn festival itself and our chapter's mandate, in praying: Open us to new expressions of the worship of our God as we gather in his presence, bringing treasures new and old. At die festival's conclusion, cake and punch in die church hall refreshed weary voices and facilitated spirited chatter, congratulations, and good wishes for die future of SOCHS. As of Labor Day 2010 we have embarked on our tiiirteendi season, and we want to share our history with readers of The Hymn in die hope of encouraging otiiers to start up a chapter of their own. The rewards are numerous. In the beginning The initiative began, as so many fine projects do, in the wake of a Hymn Society summer conference, at Grand Rapids, Michigan, in 1998. George Bell and Bill Lamb, two of the Hymn Society members in attendance, recalled the April editorial in The Hymn, by then executive director Carl Daw, FHS, expressing a wish to see more chapters of the parent organization across die USA and Canada. Fuelled by die enthusiasm of the conference and by coffee in the courtyard one morning, an exciting idea bubbled to the surface: might there be enough interested hymnophiles in Toronto and the surrounding area to make a chapter viable? With the counsel of John Ambrose and Don Parsons, Bill and George set out on the journey. After address labels were obtained from the Hymn Society office, about fifty letters were mailed to Hymn Society members living within an hour's drive from Toronto, inviting them to an inaugural meeting of the new chapter at the local Baptist Convention offices. The letter highlighted the recent production of three national denominational hymnals, and the resulting pool of experience and enthusiasm in the southern Ontario region. As if to strike a template for future meetings, the event included introductions and hymn singing, followed by an informative presentation on Voices United, recently published by the United Church of Canada. Leaders in the discussion were Fred Graham, John Ambrose, Don Parsons, and Ken Inkster, who contrasted the structure of the new resource with that of the 1971 Hymn book of the United Church/Anglican Church of Canada. The evening closed with a discussion of the directions the new chapter might take. Following a flurry of creative suggestions, the consensus was that the organization should crawl before it walked, and that it would be time well spent to get to know each other better before engaging major challenges. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,934
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,002
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,040
Tête enseignante GPT0,210
Écart entre enseignants0,170 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2011
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueThe HymnMême sujetCanadian Identity and HistoryTravaux en français237 207