MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W293951202

The Making of a Chapter: THE SOUTHERN ONTARIO CHAPTER OF THE HYMN SOCIETY

2011· article· en· W293951202 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Lydia Pedersen

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Hymn · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHymnFaithArtSingingArt historyChorusHistoryEnthusiasmPerformance artTheologyLiteraturePhilosophyManagement
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction On a sunny Sunday afternoon in October, 2008, Humbercrest United Church in Toronto's West End buzzed with anticipation. In die lofty chancel die Salvation Army Toronto Brass band took turns with guest organist Fred Graham in playing a boisterous halfhour prelude of hymn arrangements old and new as people filled die pews to enjoy a special hymn festival, Great hymns of the faith. Altiiough director of music Melvin Hurst conducts a similar festival every second year, this one was just a little more distinctive because it celebrated die tendi anniversary of SOCHS, die Soutiiern Ontario Chapter of die Hymn Society, which co-sponsored die event with die host church. The opening hymn, When in our music God is glorified,'' was a splendid introduction to our birtiiday party. Research for die narrators had been generously supplied by John Ambrose, editor of die hymnal Voices United and one of die founding members of SOCHS. The ministers and members of Humbercrest offered scripture readings, and die audience sang with enthusiasm hymns that ranged from Standing on die promises to die contemporary When we are living. A particularly proud moment in die program was die singing of die winning hymn of our recent first-ever competition. It had invited new texts based on die tiieme can we sing the Lord's song in a strange land? From fifty-seven submissions arising out of Canada, die USA, and Britain, adjudicators chose Stan Engle's How can we sing our songs of faitii? and runner-up Frederick Harrison's O how can we sing die Lord's song? Two lines from die latter summed up botii die hymn festival itself and our chapter's mandate, in praying: Open us to new expressions of the worship of our God as we gather in his presence, bringing treasures new and old. At die festival's conclusion, cake and punch in die church hall refreshed weary voices and facilitated spirited chatter, congratulations, and good wishes for die future of SOCHS. As of Labor Day 2010 we have embarked on our tiiirteendi season, and we want to share our history with readers of The Hymn in die hope of encouraging otiiers to start up a chapter of their own. The rewards are numerous. In the beginning The initiative began, as so many fine projects do, in the wake of a Hymn Society summer conference, at Grand Rapids, Michigan, in 1998. George Bell and Bill Lamb, two of the Hymn Society members in attendance, recalled the April editorial in The Hymn, by then executive director Carl Daw, FHS, expressing a wish to see more chapters of the parent organization across die USA and Canada. Fuelled by die enthusiasm of the conference and by coffee in the courtyard one morning, an exciting idea bubbled to the surface: might there be enough interested hymnophiles in Toronto and the surrounding area to make a chapter viable? With the counsel of John Ambrose and Don Parsons, Bill and George set out on the journey. After address labels were obtained from the Hymn Society office, about fifty letters were mailed to Hymn Society members living within an hour's drive from Toronto, inviting them to an inaugural meeting of the new chapter at the local Baptist Convention offices. The letter highlighted the recent production of three national denominational hymnals, and the resulting pool of experience and enthusiasm in the southern Ontario region. As if to strike a template for future meetings, the event included introductions and hymn singing, followed by an informative presentation on Voices United, recently published by the United Church of Canada. Leaders in the discussion were Fred Graham, John Ambrose, Don Parsons, and Ken Inkster, who contrasted the structure of the new resource with that of the 1971 Hymn book of the United Church/Anglican Church of Canada. The evening closed with a discussion of the directions the new chapter might take. Following a flurry of creative suggestions, the consensus was that the organization should crawl before it walked, and that it would be time well spent to get to know each other better before engaging major challenges. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.934
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.170 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe HymnSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207