MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2944071818 · doi:10.1111/aos.14131

Microvascular parameters evaluated with optical coherence tomography‐angiography in children: comparison between preterm and full‐term patients

2019· letter· en· W2944071818 sur OpenAlexaff
Francesca Periti, Caterina Toma, Carmen Plaitano, Rosanna Guagliano, Chiara Bertone, Donatella Barillà, Cristina Arpa, Giulio Vandelli, Alessandro Bianchi, Andrea Vulpetti, Carmine Tinelli, Paolo Emilio Bianchi

Notice bibliographique

RevueActa Ophthalmologica · 2019
Typeletter
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueRetinopathy of Prematurity Studies
Établissements canadiensUniversity Hospital Foundation
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineRetinopathy of prematurityRetinalOphthalmologyFull TermGestational ageFoveal avascular zoneOptical coherence tomographyFluorescein angiographyAngiographySurgeryPregnancy

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Mechanisms leading to anomalous retinal vessel formation underlying retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) are of great interest (Quazi et al. 2009; Tasman 2011) and not fully understood. Optical coherence tomography angiography (OCT-A) is a recent noninvasive retinal imaging technique that could be useful in the study of retinal vascularization of former preterm infants. The aim of this study was to quantitatively evaluate and compare macular microvascular parameters, foveal avascular zone (FAZ) area and perfusion density (PD), in full-term and preterm children by means of swept-source (SS) OCT-A. Two hundred fifty eyes of 133 children were prospectively enrolled. One hundred sixty-seven eyes were of full-term children (gestational age, GA ≥ 37 weeks, group A), 52 eyes of preterm children without ROP (group B), 11 eyes of preterm patients with spontaneously regressed ROP (group C), 20 eyes of preterm patients with laser-treated ROP (group D). The study adhered to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the institutional Ethics Committee; all parents signed a written informed consent before examination. Optical coherence tomography angiography (OCT-A) images were acquired with Dri SS-OCT-A Triton plus (Topcon Medical Systems Europe, Milano, Italy), and a 4.5 × 4.5 mm macular map was captured for all patients. Foveal avascular zone (FAZ) area was manually delineated using Topcon's intrinsic tool, and PD was evaluated at the superficial and deep capillary plexus using image j (https://imagej.nih.gov/ij/). Mean FAZ area was 241.3 ± 129.7 μm, divided as follows: group A 288.4 ± 109.6 μm, group B 173 ± 114 μm, group C 48 ± 42.1 μm, group D 132.3 ± 116 μm. Foveal avascular zone (FAZ) area was significantly different among subgroups (p < 0.0001). Group A had a significantly larger FAZ compared to all other groups (p < 0.0001). Group D had a significantly larger FAZ compared to group C (p < 0.05; Fig. 1). A linear correlation between FAZ area and birthweight (r = 0.46) and between FAZ area and GA (r = 0.53) was found. Foveal avascular zone (FAZ) area analysis after stratification by age range showed that average FAZ area between the tenth and ninetieth percentile did not change significantly with increasing age. No significant differences were found in PD among subgroups, except for a slight trend for a higher PD in group C. Age was not significantly different among subgroups. Summing up, we found a significantly smaller FAZ area in preterm compared to full-term children. Interestingly, patients with spontaneously regressed ROP had smaller FAZ than children with laser-treated ROP. In a recent study performed with OCT-A, Falavarjiani et al. (2017) reported that FAZ profile was clearly identifiable in all full-term children examined and not in many preterm ones. In the present study as well as in Falavarjani's, a small or absent FAZ proved to be an hallmark of prematurity. Our results are also consistent with data obtained by Nonobe et al. They found that FAZ of premature laser-treated patients was smaller than FAZ of healthy controls (Nonobe et al. 2019). These results seem to strengthen the hypothesis that foveal vascular development may be altered in premature patients. Furthermore, in the present study, laser-treated patients had significantly larger FAZ than patients with spontaneously regressed ROP. Therefore, we could hypothesize that laser may stop the angiogenetic factors cascade, playing a protective role against abnormal retinal vascularization. A debate could be raised on the utility of photocoagulation not only as a necessary treatment to prevent complications, but also as a potentially protective treatment against what may seem an excessive capillary vessels growth in the foveal region maybe due to high Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) levels leading to relative hypoxia. Consequently, another interesting point of discussion should be the role of anti-VEGF (an off-label treatment for ROP) on foveal vascularization. The strength of the present study is the large size of the initial population; however, the asymmetry of the subgroups is a major limitation, in particular when looking at the results of PD. On the other hand, FAZ area differences are so explicit that conclusions can be drawn despite discrepancies among group numbers. Results are consistent with the two main published studies on OCT-A in paediatric patients; further, longitudinal studies are needed to confirm these preliminary data.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Intégrité de la recherche
Catégories consensuellesIntégrité de la recherche
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,022
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,003
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,026
Tête enseignante GPT0,276
Écart entre enseignants0,249 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations8
Publié2019
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueActa OphthalmologicaMême sujetRetinopathy of Prematurity StudiesTravaux en français237 207