MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2944071818 · doi:10.1111/aos.14131

Microvascular parameters evaluated with optical coherence tomography‐angiography in children: comparison between preterm and full‐term patients

2019· letter· en· W2944071818 on OpenAlexaff
Francesca Periti, Caterina Toma, Carmen Plaitano, Rosanna Guagliano, Chiara Bertone, Donatella Barillà, Cristina Arpa, Giulio Vandelli, Alessandro Bianchi, Andrea Vulpetti, Carmine Tinelli, Paolo Emilio Bianchi

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Ophthalmologica · 2019
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRetinopathy of Prematurity Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity Hospital Foundation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineRetinopathy of prematurityRetinalOphthalmologyFull TermGestational ageFoveal avascular zoneOptical coherence tomographyFluorescein angiographyAngiographySurgeryPregnancy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mechanisms leading to anomalous retinal vessel formation underlying retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) are of great interest (Quazi et al. 2009; Tasman 2011) and not fully understood. Optical coherence tomography angiography (OCT-A) is a recent noninvasive retinal imaging technique that could be useful in the study of retinal vascularization of former preterm infants. The aim of this study was to quantitatively evaluate and compare macular microvascular parameters, foveal avascular zone (FAZ) area and perfusion density (PD), in full-term and preterm children by means of swept-source (SS) OCT-A. Two hundred fifty eyes of 133 children were prospectively enrolled. One hundred sixty-seven eyes were of full-term children (gestational age, GA ≥ 37 weeks, group A), 52 eyes of preterm children without ROP (group B), 11 eyes of preterm patients with spontaneously regressed ROP (group C), 20 eyes of preterm patients with laser-treated ROP (group D). The study adhered to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the institutional Ethics Committee; all parents signed a written informed consent before examination. Optical coherence tomography angiography (OCT-A) images were acquired with Dri SS-OCT-A Triton plus (Topcon Medical Systems Europe, Milano, Italy), and a 4.5 × 4.5 mm macular map was captured for all patients. Foveal avascular zone (FAZ) area was manually delineated using Topcon's intrinsic tool, and PD was evaluated at the superficial and deep capillary plexus using image j (https://imagej.nih.gov/ij/). Mean FAZ area was 241.3 ± 129.7 μm, divided as follows: group A 288.4 ± 109.6 μm, group B 173 ± 114 μm, group C 48 ± 42.1 μm, group D 132.3 ± 116 μm. Foveal avascular zone (FAZ) area was significantly different among subgroups (p < 0.0001). Group A had a significantly larger FAZ compared to all other groups (p < 0.0001). Group D had a significantly larger FAZ compared to group C (p < 0.05; Fig. 1). A linear correlation between FAZ area and birthweight (r = 0.46) and between FAZ area and GA (r = 0.53) was found. Foveal avascular zone (FAZ) area analysis after stratification by age range showed that average FAZ area between the tenth and ninetieth percentile did not change significantly with increasing age. No significant differences were found in PD among subgroups, except for a slight trend for a higher PD in group C. Age was not significantly different among subgroups. Summing up, we found a significantly smaller FAZ area in preterm compared to full-term children. Interestingly, patients with spontaneously regressed ROP had smaller FAZ than children with laser-treated ROP. In a recent study performed with OCT-A, Falavarjiani et al. (2017) reported that FAZ profile was clearly identifiable in all full-term children examined and not in many preterm ones. In the present study as well as in Falavarjani's, a small or absent FAZ proved to be an hallmark of prematurity. Our results are also consistent with data obtained by Nonobe et al. They found that FAZ of premature laser-treated patients was smaller than FAZ of healthy controls (Nonobe et al. 2019). These results seem to strengthen the hypothesis that foveal vascular development may be altered in premature patients. Furthermore, in the present study, laser-treated patients had significantly larger FAZ than patients with spontaneously regressed ROP. Therefore, we could hypothesize that laser may stop the angiogenetic factors cascade, playing a protective role against abnormal retinal vascularization. A debate could be raised on the utility of photocoagulation not only as a necessary treatment to prevent complications, but also as a potentially protective treatment against what may seem an excessive capillary vessels growth in the foveal region maybe due to high Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) levels leading to relative hypoxia. Consequently, another interesting point of discussion should be the role of anti-VEGF (an off-label treatment for ROP) on foveal vascularization. The strength of the present study is the large size of the initial population; however, the asymmetry of the subgroups is a major limitation, in particular when looking at the results of PD. On the other hand, FAZ area differences are so explicit that conclusions can be drawn despite discrepancies among group numbers. Results are consistent with the two main published studies on OCT-A in paediatric patients; further, longitudinal studies are needed to confirm these preliminary data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueActa OphthalmologicaSame topicRetinopathy of Prematurity StudiesFrench-language works237,207