Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage in high grade biliary hilar obstruction
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) is an effective and evolving modality. Biliary hilar strictures, however, cannot be optimally drained with EUS-BD while both endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and percutaneous drainage also have their limitations [ 1 ] [ 2 ] [ 3 ]. We describe a novel approach to EUS-BD in collaboration with interventional radiology, where hepaticogastrostomy (HPG) is performed with a bridging hilar stent to achieve optimal drainage in a Bismuth-Corlette type IV (BC-IV) obstruction ([ Video 1 ]). Video 1 Successful hepaticogastrostomy using endoscopic ultrasonography and interventional radiology for management of high grade hilar obstruction using a bridging stent technique. Sources for stents and scope pictures: Boston scientific and Pentax Quality: mobile 360 480 720 Download A 62-year-old woman who had undergone radical cholecystectomy with duodenal resection and gastrojejunostomy for gallbladder cancer presented with symptoms suggestive of biliary obstruction. Computed tomography (CT) scan revealed a BC-IV hilar stricture due to tumor recurrence. Despite insertion of bilateral metal stents via the percutaneous route, the patient continued to have recurrent cholangitis due to rapid tumor stent ingrowth, leading to interruptions in chemotherapy treatment. Following informed consent by the patient, a decision was made to undertake EUS-BD in collaboration with interventional radiology. Cholangiography via the percutaneous tube (PTBD) showed complete obstruction of both metal stents at the hilum due to tumor tissue ingrowth. A 0.035-inch guidewire was inserted, traversing the hilum through the stent indices and into segment III of the left intrahepatic biliary tree ([ Fig. 1 ]). A transgastric puncture of this biliary segment was then performed with a 19-gauge needle under EUS guidance followed by the advancement of a 0.035-inch guidewire antegradely. The wire was then captured via a snare inserted via the PTBD route and pulled through the percutaneous access. With optimal tension at both ends of the wire, the HPG tract was dilated to 4 mm with a dilating balloon inserted from the PTBD. A 10-mm × 80-mm partially covered metal stent (WallFlex, Boston Scientific, Marlborough, Massachusetts, USA) was then deployed simultaneously with deflation and pulling back of the dilating balloon, limiting the time between dilation and stent insertion and therefore the risk of bile leak ([ Fig. 2 ] and [ Fig. 3 ]). Over the same guidewire, a bridging stent (8-mm × 40-mm balloon-expandable; Cordis) was then successfully deployed across the biliary bifurcation and hilar stricture. A second bridging stent (8 mm × 40 mm self-expandable; Cordis) was then placed between the HPG stent and biliary bifurcation stent ( [ Fig.4 ]). A post-procedural cholangiogram confirmed complete drainage of the biliary system. Fig. 1 Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) view of dilated segment III of the left intrahepatic biliary tree with a guidewire within (inserted via percutaneous access). This is prior to the transgastric needle puncture. Fig. 2 Fluoroscopic view of an endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS)-guided hepaticogastrostomy stent insertion. Fig. 3 Endoscopic view of an hepaticogastrostomy (HPG) stent. Fig. 4 Fluoroscopic view of hepaticogastrostomy (HPG) stent and bridging stents. A, occluded previously placed hilar stents; B, 8-mm × 40-mm balloon-expandable stent across the biliary bifurcation and hilar stricture; C, 8-mm × 40-mm self-expandable stent placed between the HPG stent and biliary bifurcation stent; D, HPG stent. The patient did well after the procedure and at 4-month follow-up she showed no signs of biliary obstruction or cholangitis. In conclusion, a collaborative approach with interventional radiology can further extend the therapeutic indications for EUS-BD and allow successful establishment of stable biliary stents with optimal drainage in high grade hilar obstruction. Further studies are needed to assess safety. Endoscopy_UCTN_Code_TTT_1AS_2AD Endoscopy E-Videos https://eref.thieme.de/e-videos Endoscopy E-Videos is a free access online section, reporting on interesting cases and new techniques in gastroenterological endoscopy. All papers include a high quality video and all contributions are freely accessible online. This section has its own submission website at https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/e-videos
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».