MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2945575034 · doi:10.1055/a-0836-2514

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage in high grade biliary hilar obstruction

2019· article· en· W2945575034 on OpenAlexaff
Ali Bessissow, David Valenti, Prosanto Chaudhury, Alan Barkun, Kevin Waschke, Yen‐I Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueEndoscopy · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBiliary drainageEndoscopic ultrasoundDrainageUltrasoundEndoscopyRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) is an effective and evolving modality. Biliary hilar strictures, however, cannot be optimally drained with EUS-BD while both endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and percutaneous drainage also have their limitations [ 1 ] [ 2 ] [ 3 ]. We describe a novel approach to EUS-BD in collaboration with interventional radiology, where hepaticogastrostomy (HPG) is performed with a bridging hilar stent to achieve optimal drainage in a Bismuth-Corlette type IV (BC-IV) obstruction ([ Video 1 ]). Video 1 Successful hepaticogastrostomy using endoscopic ultrasonography and interventional radiology for management of high grade hilar obstruction using a bridging stent technique. Sources for stents and scope pictures: Boston scientific and Pentax Quality: mobile 360 480 720 Download A 62-year-old woman who had undergone radical cholecystectomy with duodenal resection and gastrojejunostomy for gallbladder cancer presented with symptoms suggestive of biliary obstruction. Computed tomography (CT) scan revealed a BC-IV hilar stricture due to tumor recurrence. Despite insertion of bilateral metal stents via the percutaneous route, the patient continued to have recurrent cholangitis due to rapid tumor stent ingrowth, leading to interruptions in chemotherapy treatment. Following informed consent by the patient, a decision was made to undertake EUS-BD in collaboration with interventional radiology. Cholangiography via the percutaneous tube (PTBD) showed complete obstruction of both metal stents at the hilum due to tumor tissue ingrowth. A 0.035-inch guidewire was inserted, traversing the hilum through the stent indices and into segment III of the left intrahepatic biliary tree ([ Fig. 1 ]). A transgastric puncture of this biliary segment was then performed with a 19-gauge needle under EUS guidance followed by the advancement of a 0.035-inch guidewire antegradely. The wire was then captured via a snare inserted via the PTBD route and pulled through the percutaneous access. With optimal tension at both ends of the wire, the HPG tract was dilated to 4 mm with a dilating balloon inserted from the PTBD. A 10-mm × 80-mm partially covered metal stent (WallFlex, Boston Scientific, Marlborough, Massachusetts, USA) was then deployed simultaneously with deflation and pulling back of the dilating balloon, limiting the time between dilation and stent insertion and therefore the risk of bile leak ([ Fig. 2 ] and [ Fig. 3 ]). Over the same guidewire, a bridging stent (8-mm × 40-mm balloon-expandable; Cordis) was then successfully deployed across the biliary bifurcation and hilar stricture. A second bridging stent (8 mm × 40 mm self-expandable; Cordis) was then placed between the HPG stent and biliary bifurcation stent ( [ Fig.4 ]). A post-procedural cholangiogram confirmed complete drainage of the biliary system. Fig. 1 Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) view of dilated segment III of the left intrahepatic biliary tree with a guidewire within (inserted via percutaneous access). This is prior to the transgastric needle puncture. Fig. 2 Fluoroscopic view of an endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS)-guided hepaticogastrostomy stent insertion. Fig. 3 Endoscopic view of an hepaticogastrostomy (HPG) stent. Fig. 4 Fluoroscopic view of hepaticogastrostomy (HPG) stent and bridging stents. A, occluded previously placed hilar stents; B, 8-mm × 40-mm balloon-expandable stent across the biliary bifurcation and hilar stricture; C, 8-mm × 40-mm self-expandable stent placed between the HPG stent and biliary bifurcation stent; D, HPG stent. The patient did well after the procedure and at 4-month follow-up she showed no signs of biliary obstruction or cholangitis. In conclusion, a collaborative approach with interventional radiology can further extend the therapeutic indications for EUS-BD and allow successful establishment of stable biliary stents with optimal drainage in high grade hilar obstruction. Further studies are needed to assess safety. Endoscopy_UCTN_Code_TTT_1AS_2AD Endoscopy E-Videos https://eref.thieme.de/e-videos Endoscopy E-Videos is a free access online section, reporting on interesting cases and new techniques in gastroenterological endoscopy. All papers include a high quality video and all contributions are freely accessible online. This section has its own submission website at https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/e-videos

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEndoscopySame topicGallbladder and Bile Duct DisordersFrench-language works237,207