MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2948229777 · doi:10.1353/his.2019.0018

Defining Métis: Catholic Missionaries and the Idea of Civilization in Northwestern Saskatchewan, 1845-1898 by Timothy P. Foran

2019· article· en· W2948229777 sur OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Gwynneth C. D. Jones

Notice bibliographique

RevueHistoire sociale · 2019
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueCanadian Identity and History
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésCivilizationPremiseCriticismPopulationHistoryClassicsSociologyGenealogyLiteratureEpistemologyPhilosophyArtDemographyArchaeology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Defining Métis: Catholic Missionaries and the Idea of Civilization in Northwestern Saskatchewan, 1845-1898 by Timothy P. Foran Gwynneth C. D. Jones Foran, Timothy P. – Defining Métis: Catholic Missionaries and the Idea of Civilization in Northwestern Saskatchewan, 1845-1898. Winnipeg: University of Manitoba Press, 2017. Pp. 229. As a researcher who has spent many a trying hour deciphering the pinched and minuscule scribbling of nineteenth-century Oblate missionary priests in hopes of obtaining descriptions and insights regarding the Indigenous communities with whom they lived, I was delighted by the promise and premise of Foran's book. As he comments in his excellent introduction, previous researchers using these records have overlooked "the origins, education, affiliation and clerical status" of missionary authors, as well as "their reasons for writing, their intended audience, and their use of epistolary codes and conventions," "emphasizing content to the exclusion of authorship, intention and form," turning "missionary commentators into an undifferentiated, unchanging, and unbiased record-keeping body" (p. 3). In this criticism, Foran includes demographic historians using missionary-generated records to develop population studies, stating that "census-taking and record-keeping were assumed to be standardized, objective, and impersonal processes that registered unequivocal data on Métis communities" (p. 3). He writes that "implicit … in these historiographies is the notion of a singular, empirically existing, and readily identifiable Métis population that was susceptible to discovery and description by Catholic missionaries. The present study complicates this notion by contending that Catholic missionaries did not simply discover and describe Métis populations, but rather that they played a critical role in its conceptual production and in the delineation of its collective characteristics" (p. 4). This matters, as Foran points out, because after Canada purchased the territory in which these people lived from the Hudson's Bay Company, "the state drew heavily on Catholic missionary knowledge to identify, classify, and govern its newest Indigenous charges" (p. 5). The Oblates, for whom the generation and keeping of narrative and demographic records on their missions was an essential task mandated from the highest authorities in their order, contributed advice, the influence of their priests, and information from their vital statistics registers to Canadian officials for such processes as Treaty negotiations and the issuance of land entitlements to Métis people. These processes and classifications have had profound and long-lasting implications for Indigenous communities, which have in many cases been fractured and colonized by these distinctions in ways that have become deeply entrenched. The origins of this book lie in an accession of records from the Oblate mission at Île-à-la-Crosse in present-day northwestern Saskatchewan to the archives maintained by the Société historique de Saint-Boniface in Winnipeg, completed just as Foran was starting the research for his doctoral thesis. This mission, located at an important point along fur trade routes of the late eighteenth to late nineteenth centuries, had been identified by researchers (and by Métis people themselves) as the location of an early-origin historic Métis community of notable persistence and resilience, incorporating successive waves of newcomers into family networks over time. Foran was therefore surprised when the missionary [End Page 232] chroniclers of this community consistently applied the term "sauvage" to their charges, introducing the term "métis" into their records only in the early 1870s, about 25 years after their arrival. The term "métis," theorizes Foran, was applied only when Indigenous people fit "the Oblates' conception of le peuple métis as an Indigenous collectivity exhibiting clear markers of a Lower Canadian paternal heritage—namely communication in a dialect of French and membership in the institutional Catholic Church" (p. 9), a conception formed in Red River, where mission activity had commenced in 1818 and where the most senior posts in the Catholic hierarchy were located. Given contemporary controversies of regarding the appropriate use of the term "Métis" for Indigenous populations across Canada and claims to the term by a range of self-identified Indigenous persons (let alone the present-day parsings of the word "sauvage" or "savage" in historical documents), an analysis of the assumptions and applications of those terms in the Oblate source material...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,142
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,308

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0020,004
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0080,013
Communication savante0,0040,003
Science ouverte0,0010,003
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,004
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0050,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,005
Tête enseignante GPT0,205
Écart entre enseignants0,201 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2019
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueHistoire socialeMême sujetCanadian Identity and HistoryTravaux en français237 207