MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2948229777 · doi:10.1353/his.2019.0018

Defining Métis: Catholic Missionaries and the Idea of Civilization in Northwestern Saskatchewan, 1845-1898 by Timothy P. Foran

2019· article· en· W2948229777 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Gwynneth C. D. Jones

Bibliographic record

VenueHistoire sociale · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCivilizationPremiseCriticismPopulationHistoryClassicsSociologyGenealogyLiteratureEpistemologyPhilosophyArtDemographyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Defining Métis: Catholic Missionaries and the Idea of Civilization in Northwestern Saskatchewan, 1845-1898 by Timothy P. Foran Gwynneth C. D. Jones Foran, Timothy P. – Defining Métis: Catholic Missionaries and the Idea of Civilization in Northwestern Saskatchewan, 1845-1898. Winnipeg: University of Manitoba Press, 2017. Pp. 229. As a researcher who has spent many a trying hour deciphering the pinched and minuscule scribbling of nineteenth-century Oblate missionary priests in hopes of obtaining descriptions and insights regarding the Indigenous communities with whom they lived, I was delighted by the promise and premise of Foran's book. As he comments in his excellent introduction, previous researchers using these records have overlooked "the origins, education, affiliation and clerical status" of missionary authors, as well as "their reasons for writing, their intended audience, and their use of epistolary codes and conventions," "emphasizing content to the exclusion of authorship, intention and form," turning "missionary commentators into an undifferentiated, unchanging, and unbiased record-keeping body" (p. 3). In this criticism, Foran includes demographic historians using missionary-generated records to develop population studies, stating that "census-taking and record-keeping were assumed to be standardized, objective, and impersonal processes that registered unequivocal data on Métis communities" (p. 3). He writes that "implicit … in these historiographies is the notion of a singular, empirically existing, and readily identifiable Métis population that was susceptible to discovery and description by Catholic missionaries. The present study complicates this notion by contending that Catholic missionaries did not simply discover and describe Métis populations, but rather that they played a critical role in its conceptual production and in the delineation of its collective characteristics" (p. 4). This matters, as Foran points out, because after Canada purchased the territory in which these people lived from the Hudson's Bay Company, "the state drew heavily on Catholic missionary knowledge to identify, classify, and govern its newest Indigenous charges" (p. 5). The Oblates, for whom the generation and keeping of narrative and demographic records on their missions was an essential task mandated from the highest authorities in their order, contributed advice, the influence of their priests, and information from their vital statistics registers to Canadian officials for such processes as Treaty negotiations and the issuance of land entitlements to Métis people. These processes and classifications have had profound and long-lasting implications for Indigenous communities, which have in many cases been fractured and colonized by these distinctions in ways that have become deeply entrenched. The origins of this book lie in an accession of records from the Oblate mission at Île-à-la-Crosse in present-day northwestern Saskatchewan to the archives maintained by the Société historique de Saint-Boniface in Winnipeg, completed just as Foran was starting the research for his doctoral thesis. This mission, located at an important point along fur trade routes of the late eighteenth to late nineteenth centuries, had been identified by researchers (and by Métis people themselves) as the location of an early-origin historic Métis community of notable persistence and resilience, incorporating successive waves of newcomers into family networks over time. Foran was therefore surprised when the missionary [End Page 232] chroniclers of this community consistently applied the term "sauvage" to their charges, introducing the term "métis" into their records only in the early 1870s, about 25 years after their arrival. The term "métis," theorizes Foran, was applied only when Indigenous people fit "the Oblates' conception of le peuple métis as an Indigenous collectivity exhibiting clear markers of a Lower Canadian paternal heritage—namely communication in a dialect of French and membership in the institutional Catholic Church" (p. 9), a conception formed in Red River, where mission activity had commenced in 1818 and where the most senior posts in the Catholic hierarchy were located. Given contemporary controversies of regarding the appropriate use of the term "Métis" for Indigenous populations across Canada and claims to the term by a range of self-identified Indigenous persons (let alone the present-day parsings of the word "sauvage" or "savage" in historical documents), an analysis of the assumptions and applications of those terms in the Oblate source material...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.142
Threshold uncertainty score0.308

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0080.013
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHistoire socialeSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207