EVALUATING MODELS FOR CRETACEOUS PALEODRAINAGE AND SEDIMENT ROUTING USING DETRITAL ZIRCON U-PB PROVENANCE AND GEOCHRONOLOGY IN THE COLORADO FRONT RANGE
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The Late Jurassic Morrison Formation through the Aptian to Cenomanian Dakota Group is a succession of fluvial, deltaic, and shallow-marine strata deposited within the back-bulge of the Mesozoic Sevier retroarc foreland-basin system, now located in the present-day Colorado Front Range and US midcontinent. Multiple sediment-routing models have been proposed for North American paleodrainage during this time period. This study investigates the Late Jurassic through Campanian Morrison, Lytle, Plainview, and Dakota succession with the following objectives: (a) examine river system scale and fluvial style differences from alluvial architectures; (b) test previous paleodrainage models through detrital zircon (DZ) U-Pb geochronology and provenance and present a new reconstruction of sediment-dispersal patterns; and (c) develop the geochronological framework using DZ U-Pb maximum depositional ages (MDAs) that approximate true depositional age (TDA). Comparison of alluvial architectures and sedimentological characteristics from sites along the Colorado Front Range result in observed differences in fluvial styles represented by the Morrison, Lytle, Plainview, and Dakota formations. The Morrison Formation is interpreted to have been deposited by a net aggradational meandering fluvial system; the Lytle Formation is interpreted to represent a mixed bedrock-alluvial valley system, where the river is inherently degradational and confined within a broad incised valley; the Plainview Formation is interpreted to consist of mixed fluvial and near shore marine deposits, aggrading within the Lytle bedrock valleys; and the upper Dakota Formation is interpreted to represent a fluvial system that cut across delta plains represented by the lower Dakota during regression. Statistical analysis of DZ U-Pb populations of 22 samples collected for this study indicate clear differences between the interpreted west-derived Cretaceous Lytle and Dakota signatures of the Colorado Front Range, southwestern Kansas, and the Black Hills of South Dakota and the interpreted east-derived Dakota signatures of the further eastern US midcontinent in Kansas, Nebraska, and South Dakota. West-derived samples have DZ U-Pb signatures with Western Cordilleran magmatic arc grains present, which are distinctly absent in east-derived samples. Moreover, east-derived DZ U-Pb signatures are dominated by primary Appalachian-Grenville populations from the Appalachian-Ouachita Cordillera, whereas west-derived signatures are dominated by recycled Appalachian-Grenville populations from the Sevier fold and thrust belt, along with contributions from the Western Cordilleran magmatic arc, Mid-Continent, and Yavapai-Mazatzal source terrains. Mixing models and statistical comparisons were used to provide a new paleodrainage model that features convergence of east- and west-derived systems in the US midcontinent, which then flow north toward the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin and Boreal Sea. This fluvial system is interpreted as the south-to-north oriented axial system that deposited the Early Cretaceous McMurray Formation of the Alberta Oil Sands. DZ samples from the Late Jurassic Morrison Formation in Colorado produced MDAs that are slightly younger than ages previously published from sanidine grains in bentonites from Utah. These new MDAs indicate that Morrison deposition continued for another 1-2 Myrs longer than previously thought. DZ samples from the Early Cretaceous Lytle and age-equivalent formations did not produce multiple young volcanogenic grains to enable MDA calculation due to deposition during the Early Cretaceous magmatic lull. DZ samples from the Albian to Cenomanian Dakota Formation produced the first U-Pb ages for the Dakota in Colorado and MDAs consistent with published age estimates.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,006 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».