MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2948937018 · doi:10.1130/abs/2019sc-327662

EVALUATING MODELS FOR CRETACEOUS PALEODRAINAGE AND SEDIMENT ROUTING USING DETRITAL ZIRCON U-PB PROVENANCE AND GEOCHRONOLOGY IN THE COLORADO FRONT RANGE

2019· article· en· W2948937018 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Caroline M. Nazworth, Mike Blum

Bibliographic record

VenueAbstracts with programs - Geological Society of America · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological Modeling and Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersColorado Scientific Society
KeywordsGeochronologyZirconProvenanceGeologyCretaceousRange (aeronautics)Front (military)GeochemistrySedimentPaleontologyOceanographyMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Late Jurassic Morrison Formation through the Aptian to Cenomanian Dakota Group is a succession of fluvial, deltaic, and shallow-marine strata deposited within the back-bulge of the Mesozoic Sevier retroarc foreland-basin system, now located in the present-day Colorado Front Range and US midcontinent. Multiple sediment-routing models have been proposed for North American paleodrainage during this time period. This study investigates the Late Jurassic through Campanian Morrison, Lytle, Plainview, and Dakota succession with the following objectives: (a) examine river system scale and fluvial style differences from alluvial architectures; (b) test previous paleodrainage models through detrital zircon (DZ) U-Pb geochronology and provenance and present a new reconstruction of sediment-dispersal patterns; and (c) develop the geochronological framework using DZ U-Pb maximum depositional ages (MDAs) that approximate true depositional age (TDA). Comparison of alluvial architectures and sedimentological characteristics from sites along the Colorado Front Range result in observed differences in fluvial styles represented by the Morrison, Lytle, Plainview, and Dakota formations. The Morrison Formation is interpreted to have been deposited by a net aggradational meandering fluvial system; the Lytle Formation is interpreted to represent a mixed bedrock-alluvial valley system, where the river is inherently degradational and confined within a broad incised valley; the Plainview Formation is interpreted to consist of mixed fluvial and near shore marine deposits, aggrading within the Lytle bedrock valleys; and the upper Dakota Formation is interpreted to represent a fluvial system that cut across delta plains represented by the lower Dakota during regression. Statistical analysis of DZ U-Pb populations of 22 samples collected for this study indicate clear differences between the interpreted west-derived Cretaceous Lytle and Dakota signatures of the Colorado Front Range, southwestern Kansas, and the Black Hills of South Dakota and the interpreted east-derived Dakota signatures of the further eastern US midcontinent in Kansas, Nebraska, and South Dakota. West-derived samples have DZ U-Pb signatures with Western Cordilleran magmatic arc grains present, which are distinctly absent in east-derived samples. Moreover, east-derived DZ U-Pb signatures are dominated by primary Appalachian-Grenville populations from the Appalachian-Ouachita Cordillera, whereas west-derived signatures are dominated by recycled Appalachian-Grenville populations from the Sevier fold and thrust belt, along with contributions from the Western Cordilleran magmatic arc, Mid-Continent, and Yavapai-Mazatzal source terrains. Mixing models and statistical comparisons were used to provide a new paleodrainage model that features convergence of east- and west-derived systems in the US midcontinent, which then flow north toward the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin and Boreal Sea. This fluvial system is interpreted as the south-to-north oriented axial system that deposited the Early Cretaceous McMurray Formation of the Alberta Oil Sands. DZ samples from the Late Jurassic Morrison Formation in Colorado produced MDAs that are slightly younger than ages previously published from sanidine grains in bentonites from Utah. These new MDAs indicate that Morrison deposition continued for another 1-2 Myrs longer than previously thought. DZ samples from the Early Cretaceous Lytle and age-equivalent formations did not produce multiple young volcanogenic grains to enable MDA calculation due to deposition during the Early Cretaceous magmatic lull. DZ samples from the Albian to Cenomanian Dakota Formation produced the first U-Pb ages for the Dakota in Colorado and MDAs consistent with published age estimates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.480
Threshold uncertainty score0.440

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAbstracts with programs - Geological Society of AmericaSame topicGeological Modeling and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207