S149 FIXED‐DURATION VENETOCLAX PLUS OBINUTUZUMAB IMPROVES PROGRESSION‐FREE SURVIVAL AND MINIMAL RESIDUAL DISEASE NEGATIVITY IN PATIENTS WITH PREVIOUSLY UNTREATED CLL AND COMORBIDITIES
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background: The multinational, open‐label, phase 3 CLL14 trial (NCT02242942) compared fixed‐duration targeted venetoclax plus obinutuzumab (VenG) treatment with chlorambucil‐obinutuzumab (ClbG) treatment in previously untreated patients (pts) with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and comorbidities. Aims: We present endpoint analyses with particular emphasis on progression‐free survival (PFS) and minimal residual disease (MRD)‐negativity. Methods: Pts with a CIRS score >6 and/or an estimated creatinine clearance <70 mL/min were randomized 1:1 to receive equal duration treatment with 12 cycles of standard Clb or Ven 400 mg daily in combination with G for the first 6 cycles. The primary endpoint was PFS. MRD‐negativity in peripheral blood (PB) or bone marrow (BM) 3 months after treatment completion was a key secondary endpoint. MRD was analyzed serially from Cycle 4 every 3 months by an allele‐specific oligonucleotide polymerase chain reaction assay (ASO‐PCR; cut‐off, 10 −4 ) and by next generation sequencing (NGS; cut‐offs, 10 −4 , 10 −5 , 10 −6 ). Results: In total, 432 pts were enrolled; 216 in each treatment group (intent‐to‐treat population). Median age, total CIRS score, and CrCl at baseline were 72 years, 8, and 66.4 ml/min respectively. After 29 months median follow‐up, superior PFS was observed with VenG vs ClbG (Figure 1a). Median PFS was not reached in either group: at Month 24, PFS rates were 88% with VenG and 64% with ClbG (hazard ratio [HR] 0.35; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.23–0.53; P < 0.0001). MRD‐negativity by ASO‐PCR was significantly higher with VenG vs ClbG in both PB (76% vs 35% [P < 0.0001]) and BM (57% vs 17% [P < 0.0001]) 3 months after treatment completion. Overall, 75% of VenG MRD‐negative pts in PB were also MRD‐negative in BM vs 49% in the ClbG group. Landmark analysis for this timepoint by PB MRD status showed that MRD‐negativity was associated with longer PFS. MRD‐negativity rates were more sustainable with VenG: 81% (VenG) vs 27% (ClbG) of pts were MRD‐negative 12 months after treatment completion; HR for MRD conversion 0.19; 95% CI 0.12–0.30 (median time off‐treatment: 19 months) (Figure 1b). MRD‐negativity rates by NGS confirmed these results; 78% (VenG) vs 34% (ClbG) of pts had MRD‐negative status at <10 −4 , 35% vs 15% at ≥10 −6 –<10 −5 and 31% vs 4% at <10 −6 , respectively. Summary/Conclusion: Fixed‐duration VenG induced deep, high (<10 −4 in 3/4 of pts and <10 −6 in 1/3 of pts), and long lasting MRD‐negativity rates (with a low rate of conversion to MRD‐positive status 1 year after treatment) in previously untreated pts with CLL and comorbidities, translating into improved PFS. image
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».