PF767 PHASE 2 STUDY EVALUATING THE SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF ONE OR TWO DOSES OF DONOR LYMPHOCYTES DEPLETED OF HOST ALLOREACTIVE T‐CELLS (ATIR101) FOLLOWING T‐CELL‐DEPLETED HAPLOIDENTICAL HSCT
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background: The use of ex vivo T‐cell‐depleted haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo HSCT) minimizes the risk of severe graft‐versus‐host disease (GVHD). However, delayed immune reconstitution increases the risk of serious infections and relapse. ATIR101 is a donor‐derived, T‐cell‐enriched leukocyte preparation depleted ex vivo of host‐alloreactive T cells. When administered as an adjunctive infusion after T‐cell‐depleted haplo HSCT, ATIR101 aims to deliver donor T cells that can facilitate early immune protection and provide anti‐leukemic activity while minimizing the risk of GVHD. Aims: In a previous Phase 2 study of a single ATIR101 infusion of 2 × 10 6 T cells/kg in patients with AML/ALL, overall survival (OS) at 1 year was 61% with no cases of Grade III/IV acute GVHD (aGVHD; Ref). It was hypothesized that two doses may improve efficacy further; therefore, a Phase 2 exploratory study was conducted (CR‐AIR‐008; NCT02500550). Methods: Seventeen patients with hematologic malignancies (who provided informed consent) received myeloablative conditioning followed by a CD34‐selected stem cell graft. Two ATIR101 infusions of 2 × 10 6 T cells/kg derived from the same donor were planned for 28–32 and 70–74 days post HSCT. Patients did not receive GVHD prophylactic immunosuppression. The protocol allowed for evaluation of the safety of the double dose in the initial 6 patients, permitting an adjustment to a single dose in the case of dose‐limiting toxicity (Grade III/IV aGVHD within 120 days post HSCT). The primary endpoint was the incidence of Grade III/IV aGVHD up to 180 days post HSCT and patients were followed for 1 year for secondary endpoints, including: transplant‐related mortality (TRM), relapse‐related mortality (RRM), GVHD‐free relapse‐free survival (GRFS), and OS. Results: Two of the first 6 patients that who received a double dose of ATIR101 (4 AML, 2 MDS) experienced Grade III/IV aGVHD within 120 days of HSCT (1 Grade III at 25 days, 1 Grade IV at 18 days after the second dose). In accordance with the protocol, the remaining 11 patients were scheduled to only receive a single 2 × 10 6 T cells/kg dose on Days 28–32 (5 AML, 3 ALL, 3 MDS). Nine of these 11 patients received ATIR101 (2 did not receive ATIR101 due to an early death and a batch rejection); 2/11 developed Grade III aGVHD within 180 days. There were 2 cases of chronic GVHD in double‐dose and none in single‐dose patients. Table 1 shows secondary outcomes at 1 year. For double‐dose patients, TRM was 67%, RRM was 0%, and the 1‐year Kaplan–Meier (KM) estimate of OS was 33% and of GRFS was 17%. For single‐dose patients, TRM was 36%, RRM was 9%, and 1‐year KM estimates of OS and GRFS were 55% and 46%, respectively. Summary/Conclusion: Administration of a single dose of ATIR101 showed a favorable safety profile. There were 2 cases of Grade III aGVHD but no Grade IV aGVHD or chronic GVHD. OS and GRFS in this study confirmed results from the larger Phase 2 study of a single ATIR101 dose, and disease relapse and TRM were limited in both studies. Based on the observed Grade III/IV aGVHD, the safety profile of a second dose at the time point evaluated does not align with previous single‐dose data with ATIR101. Further investigation is needed to clarify the cell number for a second dose of ATIR101 that can be administered safely post HSCT. Based on the two Phase 2 studies with ATIR101, a large, randomized, Phase 3 trial has been initiated, comparing a single dose of ATIR101 with PTCy in haplo HSCT (HATCY; NCT02999854). image
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».