MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2959624936 · doi:10.1016/j.jdcr.2019.05.011

A case of progressive lower leg edema

2019· article· en· W2959624936 sur OpenAlexaff
AnneLiese Smylie, Jeffrey B. Tompkins, Robert Gniadecki, Tawny Hung

Notice bibliographique

RevueJAAD Case Reports · 2019
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueDermatological and COVID-19 studies
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Alberta
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineCellulitisEdemaBiopsySurgeryAbscessPast medical historyDermatologyRadiology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

A 45-year-old Nigerian man presented with a 6-month history of hyperpigmentation and progressive edema to the lower legs. His medical history was significant for HIV/AIDS with a CD4 count of 20 and an HIV viral load of 58863 copies per milliliter. He denied any infectious symptoms, such as cough, fever, dyspnea, or rigors. On his lower legs, he had woody, indurated, nonpitting edema, with large hyperpigmented patches and minimally elevated plaques (Fig 1). At follow-up 5 months later, the edema of his legs now extended to his proximal thighs and he had a new, hyperpigmented, indurated plaque on his lateral left thigh (Fig 2).Fig 2View Large Image Figure ViewerDownload Hi-res image Download (PPT) Question 1: What is the best next step for the diagnosis of this patient?A.Punch biopsy for histologic diagnosisB.Initiation of intravenous vancomycinC.Potassium hydroxide preparationD.Calculate calcium-phosphate productE.Complete blood count with Sezary prep Answers:A.Punch biopsy for histologic diagnosis – Correct. The differential diagnosis for a patient with bilateral lower leg edema accompanied with hyperpigmented patches and plaques includes lymphedema, lipodermatosclerosis, Kaposi sarcoma (KS), stasis dermatitis, chronic venous insufficiency, and many other entities.1Batra V. Baras A. Bilateral cellulitis.BMJ Case Rep. 2015; 2015 (bcr2015211117)Google Scholar Our patient has poorly controlled HIV, and a biopsy is necessary to rule out KS.B.Initiation of intravenous vancomycin – Incorrect. Intravenous vancomycin is empiric treatment for cellulitis in a patient at risk for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (HIV positive status).1Batra V. Baras A. Bilateral cellulitis.BMJ Case Rep. 2015; 2015 (bcr2015211117)Google Scholar Bilateral lower leg cellulitis is rare, and our patient does not have other stigmata of acute infections, such as fever, pain, or malaise.1Batra V. Baras A. Bilateral cellulitis.BMJ Case Rep. 2015; 2015 (bcr2015211117)Google ScholarC.Potassium hydroxide preparation – Incorrect. A potassium hydroxide preparation is a useful diagnostic test when suspecting a superficial fungal infection. Although an argument may be made for an atypical presentation of superficial fungal infection in our immunocompromised patient, it would not explain the significant edema that developed, and our patient requires a biopsy to rule out KS.D.Calculate calcium-phosphate product – Incorrect. The calcium-phosphate product is a clinically relevant tool in predicting the risk of extra-skeletal calcification in a patient with renal disease. In our patient, there is no history of renal failure or cutaneous calcification.E.Complete blood count with Sezary prep – Incorrect. Sezary syndrome is a type of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma classically characterized by the triad of lymphadenopathy, erythroderma, and Sezary cells in the blood, lymph nodes, and skin. Our patient does not have erythroderma or lymphadenopathy; therefore, this test would be inappropriate. Question 2: Based on the clinical presentation and histology, what is the most likely diagnosis?A.LipodermatosclerosisB.LymphedemaC.Stasis dermatitisD.Kaposi sarcomaE.Bilateral lower leg cellulitis Answers:A.Lipodermatosclerosis – Incorrect. Although lipodermatosclerosis is a diagnostic consideration in our patient's clinical presentation, CD31 and human herpes virus 8 (HHV-8) positivity indicate KS. Interestingly, there are increasing reports of KS mimicking other clinical and histologic entities including lymphangioma-like KS, pyogenic granuloma–like KS, lipodermatosclerosis–like KS, and ecchymotic KS.1Batra V. Baras A. Bilateral cellulitis.BMJ Case Rep. 2015; 2015 (bcr2015211117)Google Scholar, 2Dean S.M. Kaffenberger B.H. Lustberg M.E. Kaposi sarcoma: an unconventional cause of lower extremity lymphedema.Vasc Med. 2017; 22: 544Crossref Scopus (3) Google Scholar, 3Johnson E.L. Pierpont Y.N. Donate G. et al.Clinical challenge: cutaneous Kaposi's sarcoma of the lower extremity*.Int Wound J. 2011; 8: 163-168Crossref Scopus (6) Google ScholarB.Lymphedema – Incorrect. Our patient has woody, nonpitting edema, which is characteristic of lymphedema, but the findings of CD31 and HHV-8 positivity in the neoplastic capillaries are diagnostic of KS. Therefore, our patient's lymphedema is a complication of his KS.C.Stasis dermatitis – Incorrect. Stasis dermatitis is an intensely pruritic, eczematous disorder related to chronic venous insufficiency. Our patient does not complain of significant pruritus, and CD31 and HHV-8 should not be positive in stasis dermatitis. Interestingly, there are several reports of KS arising in the setting of arterial, venous, or lymphatic insufficiency with associated stasis dermatitis–like changes.3Johnson E.L. Pierpont Y.N. Donate G. et al.Clinical challenge: cutaneous Kaposi's sarcoma of the lower extremity*.Int Wound J. 2011; 8: 163-168Crossref Scopus (6) Google ScholarD.Kaposi sarcoma – Correct. The development of a new patch on the thigh at 6-month follow-up and the histologic findings of a patchy capillary proliferation in a tiered distribution are suggestive of KS. CD31 and HHV-8 immunohistochemical stains are positive in the neoplastic capillaries, and HHV-8 also demonstrates a focally strong positivity throughout the dermis in a tiered distribution, which confirms the diagnosis of KS (Fig 3).E.Bilateral lower leg cellulitis – Incorrect. Clinically, the patient does not have other stigmata of acute infection such as fever, pain, or malaise, and histology does not show a dense neutrophilic infiltrate to support an acute infectious process. Question 3. Based on the AIDS Clinical Trial Group, our patient has stage T1I1S0 Kaposi sarcoma. Of the treatment options below, choose the best option for treatment of this individual.A.No pharmacologic management indicatedB.Combination antiretroviral therapy (cART)C.cART and liposomal daunorubicinD.cART and paclitaxelE.cART and topical alitretinoin Answers:A.No pharmacologic management indicated – Incorrect. According to the AIDS Clinical Trial Group, our patient has stage T1I1S0 KS, which is considered poor risk prognostically.4Schneider J.W. Dittmer D.P. Diagnosis and treatment of Kaposi sarcoma.Am J Clin Dermatol. 2017; 18: 529-539Crossref Scopus (65) Google Scholar Pharmacologic management is indicated to prevent progression of the patient's KS and alleviate his extensive edema.B.cART – Incorrect. cART is recommended in essentially all patients with AIDS-related KS, and the importance of strict compliance with cART should be emphasized in this patient.5Gonçalves P.H. Uldrick T.S. Yarchoan R. HIV-associated Kaposi sarcoma and related diseases.AIDS. 2017; 31: 1903-1916Crossref Scopus (69) Google Scholar However, our patient has more advanced stage KS as a result of his tumor-related edema, and he requires systemic chemotherapy to help control his disease.C.cART and liposomal daunorubicin – Correct. Our patient has extensive tumor-related edema, which carries a poor prognosis. Systemic chemotherapy is indicated to help prevent progression of his KS and hopefully alleviate his edema. First-line systemic chemotherapy is either liposomal daunorubicin or pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, in addition to strict compliance with cART.4Schneider J.W. Dittmer D.P. Diagnosis and treatment of Kaposi sarcoma.Am J Clin Dermatol. 2017; 18: 529-539Crossref Scopus (65) Google ScholarD.cART and paclitaxel – Incorrect. Paclitaxel is considered a second-line systemic chemotherapy option in more advanced KS because of increased potential for toxicity compared with liposomal anthracyclines.4Schneider J.W. Dittmer D.P. Diagnosis and treatment of Kaposi sarcoma.Am J Clin Dermatol. 2017; 18: 529-539Crossref Scopus (65) Google Scholar Although this is an appropriate treatment strategy for our patient, it is not the best management option.E.cART and topical alitretinoin – Incorrect. Topical alitretinoin is a gel that may be used for local symptomatic treatment of KS. However, our patient has more advanced KS and requires systemic chemotherapy. Furthermore, this gel may result in inflammation and subsequent postinflammatory hyperpigmentation in our patient.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Étude de cas · Signal consensuel: Étude de cas
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,024
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,405

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,021
Tête enseignante GPT0,308
Écart entre enseignants0,287 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeÉtude de cas
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2019
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJAAD Case ReportsMême sujetDermatological and COVID-19 studiesTravaux en français237 207