A case of progressive lower leg edema
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A 45-year-old Nigerian man presented with a 6-month history of hyperpigmentation and progressive edema to the lower legs. His medical history was significant for HIV/AIDS with a CD4 count of 20 and an HIV viral load of 58863 copies per milliliter. He denied any infectious symptoms, such as cough, fever, dyspnea, or rigors. On his lower legs, he had woody, indurated, nonpitting edema, with large hyperpigmented patches and minimally elevated plaques (Fig 1). At follow-up 5 months later, the edema of his legs now extended to his proximal thighs and he had a new, hyperpigmented, indurated plaque on his lateral left thigh (Fig 2).Fig 2View Large Image Figure ViewerDownload Hi-res image Download (PPT) Question 1: What is the best next step for the diagnosis of this patient?A.Punch biopsy for histologic diagnosisB.Initiation of intravenous vancomycinC.Potassium hydroxide preparationD.Calculate calcium-phosphate productE.Complete blood count with Sezary prep Answers:A.Punch biopsy for histologic diagnosis – Correct. The differential diagnosis for a patient with bilateral lower leg edema accompanied with hyperpigmented patches and plaques includes lymphedema, lipodermatosclerosis, Kaposi sarcoma (KS), stasis dermatitis, chronic venous insufficiency, and many other entities.1Batra V. Baras A. Bilateral cellulitis.BMJ Case Rep. 2015; 2015 (bcr2015211117)Google Scholar Our patient has poorly controlled HIV, and a biopsy is necessary to rule out KS.B.Initiation of intravenous vancomycin – Incorrect. Intravenous vancomycin is empiric treatment for cellulitis in a patient at risk for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (HIV positive status).1Batra V. Baras A. Bilateral cellulitis.BMJ Case Rep. 2015; 2015 (bcr2015211117)Google Scholar Bilateral lower leg cellulitis is rare, and our patient does not have other stigmata of acute infections, such as fever, pain, or malaise.1Batra V. Baras A. Bilateral cellulitis.BMJ Case Rep. 2015; 2015 (bcr2015211117)Google ScholarC.Potassium hydroxide preparation – Incorrect. A potassium hydroxide preparation is a useful diagnostic test when suspecting a superficial fungal infection. Although an argument may be made for an atypical presentation of superficial fungal infection in our immunocompromised patient, it would not explain the significant edema that developed, and our patient requires a biopsy to rule out KS.D.Calculate calcium-phosphate product – Incorrect. The calcium-phosphate product is a clinically relevant tool in predicting the risk of extra-skeletal calcification in a patient with renal disease. In our patient, there is no history of renal failure or cutaneous calcification.E.Complete blood count with Sezary prep – Incorrect. Sezary syndrome is a type of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma classically characterized by the triad of lymphadenopathy, erythroderma, and Sezary cells in the blood, lymph nodes, and skin. Our patient does not have erythroderma or lymphadenopathy; therefore, this test would be inappropriate. Question 2: Based on the clinical presentation and histology, what is the most likely diagnosis?A.LipodermatosclerosisB.LymphedemaC.Stasis dermatitisD.Kaposi sarcomaE.Bilateral lower leg cellulitis Answers:A.Lipodermatosclerosis – Incorrect. Although lipodermatosclerosis is a diagnostic consideration in our patient's clinical presentation, CD31 and human herpes virus 8 (HHV-8) positivity indicate KS. Interestingly, there are increasing reports of KS mimicking other clinical and histologic entities including lymphangioma-like KS, pyogenic granuloma–like KS, lipodermatosclerosis–like KS, and ecchymotic KS.1Batra V. Baras A. Bilateral cellulitis.BMJ Case Rep. 2015; 2015 (bcr2015211117)Google Scholar, 2Dean S.M. Kaffenberger B.H. Lustberg M.E. Kaposi sarcoma: an unconventional cause of lower extremity lymphedema.Vasc Med. 2017; 22: 544Crossref Scopus (3) Google Scholar, 3Johnson E.L. Pierpont Y.N. Donate G. et al.Clinical challenge: cutaneous Kaposi's sarcoma of the lower extremity*.Int Wound J. 2011; 8: 163-168Crossref Scopus (6) Google ScholarB.Lymphedema – Incorrect. Our patient has woody, nonpitting edema, which is characteristic of lymphedema, but the findings of CD31 and HHV-8 positivity in the neoplastic capillaries are diagnostic of KS. Therefore, our patient's lymphedema is a complication of his KS.C.Stasis dermatitis – Incorrect. Stasis dermatitis is an intensely pruritic, eczematous disorder related to chronic venous insufficiency. Our patient does not complain of significant pruritus, and CD31 and HHV-8 should not be positive in stasis dermatitis. Interestingly, there are several reports of KS arising in the setting of arterial, venous, or lymphatic insufficiency with associated stasis dermatitis–like changes.3Johnson E.L. Pierpont Y.N. Donate G. et al.Clinical challenge: cutaneous Kaposi's sarcoma of the lower extremity*.Int Wound J. 2011; 8: 163-168Crossref Scopus (6) Google ScholarD.Kaposi sarcoma – Correct. The development of a new patch on the thigh at 6-month follow-up and the histologic findings of a patchy capillary proliferation in a tiered distribution are suggestive of KS. CD31 and HHV-8 immunohistochemical stains are positive in the neoplastic capillaries, and HHV-8 also demonstrates a focally strong positivity throughout the dermis in a tiered distribution, which confirms the diagnosis of KS (Fig 3).E.Bilateral lower leg cellulitis – Incorrect. Clinically, the patient does not have other stigmata of acute infection such as fever, pain, or malaise, and histology does not show a dense neutrophilic infiltrate to support an acute infectious process. Question 3. Based on the AIDS Clinical Trial Group, our patient has stage T1I1S0 Kaposi sarcoma. Of the treatment options below, choose the best option for treatment of this individual.A.No pharmacologic management indicatedB.Combination antiretroviral therapy (cART)C.cART and liposomal daunorubicinD.cART and paclitaxelE.cART and topical alitretinoin Answers:A.No pharmacologic management indicated – Incorrect. According to the AIDS Clinical Trial Group, our patient has stage T1I1S0 KS, which is considered poor risk prognostically.4Schneider J.W. Dittmer D.P. Diagnosis and treatment of Kaposi sarcoma.Am J Clin Dermatol. 2017; 18: 529-539Crossref Scopus (65) Google Scholar Pharmacologic management is indicated to prevent progression of the patient's KS and alleviate his extensive edema.B.cART – Incorrect. cART is recommended in essentially all patients with AIDS-related KS, and the importance of strict compliance with cART should be emphasized in this patient.5Gonçalves P.H. Uldrick T.S. Yarchoan R. HIV-associated Kaposi sarcoma and related diseases.AIDS. 2017; 31: 1903-1916Crossref Scopus (69) Google Scholar However, our patient has more advanced stage KS as a result of his tumor-related edema, and he requires systemic chemotherapy to help control his disease.C.cART and liposomal daunorubicin – Correct. Our patient has extensive tumor-related edema, which carries a poor prognosis. Systemic chemotherapy is indicated to help prevent progression of his KS and hopefully alleviate his edema. First-line systemic chemotherapy is either liposomal daunorubicin or pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, in addition to strict compliance with cART.4Schneider J.W. Dittmer D.P. Diagnosis and treatment of Kaposi sarcoma.Am J Clin Dermatol. 2017; 18: 529-539Crossref Scopus (65) Google ScholarD.cART and paclitaxel – Incorrect. Paclitaxel is considered a second-line systemic chemotherapy option in more advanced KS because of increased potential for toxicity compared with liposomal anthracyclines.4Schneider J.W. Dittmer D.P. Diagnosis and treatment of Kaposi sarcoma.Am J Clin Dermatol. 2017; 18: 529-539Crossref Scopus (65) Google Scholar Although this is an appropriate treatment strategy for our patient, it is not the best management option.E.cART and topical alitretinoin – Incorrect. Topical alitretinoin is a gel that may be used for local symptomatic treatment of KS. However, our patient has more advanced KS and requires systemic chemotherapy. Furthermore, this gel may result in inflammation and subsequent postinflammatory hyperpigmentation in our patient.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".