MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2969949156 · doi:10.1182/blood-2018-99-116676

Real World Experience with Sublingual Fentanyl for the Treatment of Sickle Cell Vaso-Occlusive Episodes in Adults in a Tertiary Canadian Emergency Department

2018· article· en· W2969949156 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Hayley Merkeley, Sam Sabbah, Richard Ward, Kevin H.M. Kuo

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2018
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueHemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders
Établissements canadiensUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health NetworkUniversity of British Columbia
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineAcute chest syndromeEmergency departmentSickle cell anemiaFentanylPediatricsOpioidVaso-occlusive crisisInternal medicineAnesthesiaDisease

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Background: Vaso-occlusive episodes (VOEs) are the most common complication of Sickle Cell Disease (SCD) and associated with acute chest syndrome (ACS), multi-organ failure (MOF), sudden death, and early mortality. International guidelines recommend administration of parenteral opioid analgesia within 30-60 minutes of presentation to an emergency department (ED) to improve VOE outcomes. Rapidity of action and non-invasive administration make trans-mucosal formulations of fentanyl (TFF) appealing for treatment. A study comparing multi-modal analgesia with TFF in adult SCD patients found a significant reduction in pain scores in the TFF group. Toronto General Hospital (TGH) ED treats over 900 SCD patients. TFF was administered to non-opiate naïve patients presenting with VOE at the TGH ED between September 2015 and November 2016. Objective: To evaluate the difference in 24-hour oral morphine equivalent (MEQ) usage in adult SCD patients who received TFF for one episode of VOE treated at TGH ED between September 2015 and November 2016, in comparison to the preceding ED visit during which no TFF was administered to the same patients. Methods: SCD patients with a diagnosis of "sickle cell disease with crisis" who received TFF were identified through the TGH ED pharmacy database. Electronic medical records for their relevant visits were reviewed. For both visits, we recorded: MEQ administered in the preceding 24-hours to presentation, number of doses of TFF (each dose was 100 mcg and assumed to be 60 mg MEQ), and additional MEQs 24 hours subsequently. We further documented time in the ED, days to discharge, change in 11-point pain scores (0-10) over 24 hours, as well as baseline characteristics including age, gender, use of disease-modifying therapy, and number of VOEs in the prior 12 months. Hemoglobin, sickle hemoglobin percentage (Hb S%), absolute reticulocyte count, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), total bilirubin, presence of acute/chronic kidney or liver disease, maximal oxygen requirements, ACS, MOF, readmission within 72 hours, or death were also recorded. Results: 201 patients were identified with a diagnosis of SCD. TGH pharmacy database identified TFF distribution at 19 separate patient visits. 3 were excluded as patients had sickle cell trait (SCT) rather than SCD, or no evidence of either; 1 because the patient refused TFF, and 1 where TFF receipt was unconfirmed. A further 5 were excluded as they had a previous visit during which TFF use was analyzed, and 2 because there was no prior comparison visit. Amongst the remaining 7 paired patient visits, there were no differences in MEQ in the 24 hours preceding ED presentation and all patients had homozygous sickle hemoglobin. Mean age was 29.14 (+/-7.69), median 27 and range 18 to 41 years. 57% were receiving disease-modifying therapy. Mean VOEs in the preceding 12-months was 5.13 (+/-2.76), median 4 and range of 2-11. One patient had pre-existing CKD and one had cirrhosis. Wilcoxon Rank Sums were used to compare outcomes between the 7 paired patient-visits (Table 1), and there was a significant difference in MEQ 24-hours after presentation (556 mg for the TFF visit vs. 197 mg for the non-TFF visit) with moderately strong evidence (p = 0.03125), but no differences in change in pain scores, time spent in ED, admission duration or oxygen requirements. Laboratory values were variably collected, but average hemoglobin (94 vs. 98 g/L), Hb S% (68 vs. 69%), and total bilirubin (74 vs. 73 micromoles/L) were consistent between visits. Average LDH levels were higher during the TFF visit (762 vs. 528 units/L), while absolute reticulocyte counts were lower (207 vs. 250 x 109/L). There was 1 ACS, and 1 return to ED within 72 hours, and both events were associated with TFF use. There were no MOF or deaths. Conclusion: TFF administration in adult SCD patients presenting with VOE appears to be safe, but was unexpectedly associated with significantly higher 24-hour MEQ use, which may reflect more severe VOE episodes at the TFF visits, as patients had higher LDH values, and increased complications (ACS and return to ED). However, there were no significant differences in other outcomes including change in pain scores, time spent in ED, admission duration or oxygen requirements. Overall, utilization of TFF in the TGH ED for SCD VOEs was low. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,503
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,989

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,001
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,008
Tête enseignante GPT0,253
Écart entre enseignants0,246 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2018
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetHemoglobinopathies and Related DisordersTravaux en français237 207