MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2969949156 · doi:10.1182/blood-2018-99-116676

Real World Experience with Sublingual Fentanyl for the Treatment of Sickle Cell Vaso-Occlusive Episodes in Adults in a Tertiary Canadian Emergency Department

2018· article· en· W2969949156 on OpenAlexaffabout
Hayley Merkeley, Sam Sabbah, Richard Ward, Kevin H.M. Kuo

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health NetworkUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAcute chest syndromeEmergency departmentSickle cell anemiaFentanylPediatricsOpioidVaso-occlusive crisisInternal medicineAnesthesiaDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: Vaso-occlusive episodes (VOEs) are the most common complication of Sickle Cell Disease (SCD) and associated with acute chest syndrome (ACS), multi-organ failure (MOF), sudden death, and early mortality. International guidelines recommend administration of parenteral opioid analgesia within 30-60 minutes of presentation to an emergency department (ED) to improve VOE outcomes. Rapidity of action and non-invasive administration make trans-mucosal formulations of fentanyl (TFF) appealing for treatment. A study comparing multi-modal analgesia with TFF in adult SCD patients found a significant reduction in pain scores in the TFF group. Toronto General Hospital (TGH) ED treats over 900 SCD patients. TFF was administered to non-opiate naïve patients presenting with VOE at the TGH ED between September 2015 and November 2016. Objective: To evaluate the difference in 24-hour oral morphine equivalent (MEQ) usage in adult SCD patients who received TFF for one episode of VOE treated at TGH ED between September 2015 and November 2016, in comparison to the preceding ED visit during which no TFF was administered to the same patients. Methods: SCD patients with a diagnosis of "sickle cell disease with crisis" who received TFF were identified through the TGH ED pharmacy database. Electronic medical records for their relevant visits were reviewed. For both visits, we recorded: MEQ administered in the preceding 24-hours to presentation, number of doses of TFF (each dose was 100 mcg and assumed to be 60 mg MEQ), and additional MEQs 24 hours subsequently. We further documented time in the ED, days to discharge, change in 11-point pain scores (0-10) over 24 hours, as well as baseline characteristics including age, gender, use of disease-modifying therapy, and number of VOEs in the prior 12 months. Hemoglobin, sickle hemoglobin percentage (Hb S%), absolute reticulocyte count, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), total bilirubin, presence of acute/chronic kidney or liver disease, maximal oxygen requirements, ACS, MOF, readmission within 72 hours, or death were also recorded. Results: 201 patients were identified with a diagnosis of SCD. TGH pharmacy database identified TFF distribution at 19 separate patient visits. 3 were excluded as patients had sickle cell trait (SCT) rather than SCD, or no evidence of either; 1 because the patient refused TFF, and 1 where TFF receipt was unconfirmed. A further 5 were excluded as they had a previous visit during which TFF use was analyzed, and 2 because there was no prior comparison visit. Amongst the remaining 7 paired patient visits, there were no differences in MEQ in the 24 hours preceding ED presentation and all patients had homozygous sickle hemoglobin. Mean age was 29.14 (+/-7.69), median 27 and range 18 to 41 years. 57% were receiving disease-modifying therapy. Mean VOEs in the preceding 12-months was 5.13 (+/-2.76), median 4 and range of 2-11. One patient had pre-existing CKD and one had cirrhosis. Wilcoxon Rank Sums were used to compare outcomes between the 7 paired patient-visits (Table 1), and there was a significant difference in MEQ 24-hours after presentation (556 mg for the TFF visit vs. 197 mg for the non-TFF visit) with moderately strong evidence (p = 0.03125), but no differences in change in pain scores, time spent in ED, admission duration or oxygen requirements. Laboratory values were variably collected, but average hemoglobin (94 vs. 98 g/L), Hb S% (68 vs. 69%), and total bilirubin (74 vs. 73 micromoles/L) were consistent between visits. Average LDH levels were higher during the TFF visit (762 vs. 528 units/L), while absolute reticulocyte counts were lower (207 vs. 250 x 109/L). There was 1 ACS, and 1 return to ED within 72 hours, and both events were associated with TFF use. There were no MOF or deaths. Conclusion: TFF administration in adult SCD patients presenting with VOE appears to be safe, but was unexpectedly associated with significantly higher 24-hour MEQ use, which may reflect more severe VOE episodes at the TFF visits, as patients had higher LDH values, and increased complications (ACS and return to ED). However, there were no significant differences in other outcomes including change in pain scores, time spent in ED, admission duration or oxygen requirements. Overall, utilization of TFF in the TGH ED for SCD VOEs was low. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.503
Threshold uncertainty score0.989

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicHemoglobinopathies and Related DisordersFrench-language works237,207