EZH2 and BCL6 Cooperate To Create The Germinal Center B-Cell Phenotype and Induce Lymphomas Through Formation and Repression Of Bivalent Chromatin Domains
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract The EZH2 histone methyltransferase is the enzymatic core of the Polycomb repressor 2 (PRC2 complex), is highly upregulated in germinal center (GC) B cells and is targeted by gain-of-function somatic mutations that enhance its ability to trimethylate histone 3 lysine 27 in diffuse large B cell lymphomas (DLBCLs) and follicular lymphomas (FLs). We explored the significance and mechanism of action of EZH2 in normal GC development and lymphomagenesis. We observed that EZH2-conditional knockout mice and mice exposed to the novel EZH2-specific inhibitor GSK503 both completely failed to form GCs or high affinity antibodies. Using ChIP-seq, sequential QChIP, RNA-seq and functional assays we demonstrated that EZH2 mediates the GC phenotype through de novo formation of bivalently marked chromatin domains (characterized by overlapping H3K27me3 repressive mark with the H3K4me3 activation mark) at the promoters of target genes involved in cell cycle regulation (e.g. CDKN1A) and in GC exit and terminal differentiation program (e.g. IRF4 and PRDM1). Notably, mutant EZH2 caused hyper-repression of these bivalent genes through increased H3K27me3, which we showed is causal to the mutant EZH2 phenotype. Mice engineered to conditionally express lymphoma-associated EZH2Y641F exhibited aberrant suppression of bivalent gene expression leading to increased proliferation, blockade of terminal differentiation, and massive GC hyperplasia. Transcriptional profiles of human DLBCL patients revealed that those with mutant EZH2 display a unique signature consisting of silencing of GC bivalent genes, suggesting that mutant EZH2 contributes to human lymphomagenesis through paralysis of bivalent chromatin domains. This scenario is reminiscent of the role of the transcriptional repressor BCL6, which is also required for GC formation. BCL6 also represses CDKN1A, IRF4 and PRDM1 and is required to maintain the proliferation and survival of DLBCL cells. Notably BCL6 represses its targets by associating with BCoR, which forms a variant of Polycomb repressor 1 (PRC1) complex. We hypothesized that EZH2 and BCL6 cooperate to mediate the GC B-cell phenotype and when aberrantly active may cooperate to form GC-derived B-cell lymphomas. Using ChIP-seq studies we found that the target promoters of BCL6-BCoR complex (but not promoters with BCL6 complexes lacking BCoR) significantly overlap with EZH2 bivalent promoter genes in primary human GC B cells and lymphoma cells (Hypergeometric test, p=1.5x10-26). Treatment of DLBCL cells with EZH2 or BCL6 inhibitors or siRNA partially derepressed these genes indicating that both factors cooperate and are required to mediate full repression of these crucial loci. To determine whether EZH2 and BCL6 cooperate to generate GC-derived lymphomas, we transduced bone marrow of IµHABCL6 mice (which mimic BCL6 translocations in DLBCL) with retrovirus encoding mutant EZH2Y641F or GFP alone, and transplanted them into lethally irradiated recipients. Only EZH2Y641F/BCL6 mice showed an accelerated lethal phenotype (log-rank test, p=0.007), with reduced median survival (EZH2Y641F: 309 days, empty vector: 453 days). Serial bone marrow transplantation resulted in even further increased lethality (log-rank test, p=0.004; median survival EZH2Y641F: 127 days, empty vector: 169 days). Given the oncogenic cooperation between BCL6 and EZH2, we hypothesized that rational combinatorial therapy with BCL6 and EZH2 inhibitors might synergistically kill DLBCLs. Indeed, by combining the EZH2 inhibitor GSK343 and the RI-BPI, a drug that inhibits BCL6 by abrogating its interaction with BCoR, we observed a potent synergistic effect on the inhibition of DLBCL cell lines proliferation. The combination of these two inhibitors in mice bearing DLBCL xenografts accordingly suppressed tumor growth more effectively than either agent alone. Finally, the combination also yielded further killing of primary human DLBCL cells growth in a co-culture system that we developed for testing primary human specimens. In summary we identified the first epigenetic mechanism of lymphomagenesis involving aberrant repression of GC-specific bivalent domains by EZH2 (PRC2) in cooperation with BCL6-BCoR (PRC1) complexes, as well as a rational epigenetic-based and molecular targeted therapeutic approach with the potential to eradicate lymphomas without harming normal tissues. Disclosures: Creasy: GlaxoSmithKline: Employment.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».