MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2979643211 · doi:10.1182/blood.v118.21.480.480

Vantage 095: Vorinostat in Combination with Bortezomib in Salvage Multiple Myeloma Patients: Final Study Results of a Global Phase 2b Trial

2011· article· en· W2979643211 sur OpenAlexaff
David S. Siegel, Meletios Α. Dimopoulos, Sung‐Soo Yoon, Jacob P. Laubach, Jonathan L. Kaufman, Hartmut Goldschmidt, Donna Reece, Xavier Leleu, Simon Durrant, Fritz Offner, Michèle Cavo, Arnon Nagler, Sundar Jagannath, Thorsten Graef, Jennifer Houp, Linda Sun, J. Howe, Sandra Wear, Kenneth C. Anderson

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2011
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueMultiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
Établissements canadiensPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineBortezomibMultiple myelomaRegimenVorinostatClinical endpointInternal medicinePhases of clinical researchDexamethasoneOncologySalvage therapyRefractory (planetary science)GastroenterologyProgressive diseaseClinical trialCombination therapyPharmacologyChemotherapyHistone deacetylase

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Abstract 480 Introduction: Vorinostat (VOR), an oral inhibitor of histone deacetylase (HDAC) class I and class II proteins, affects pathways regulating cell proliferation and apoptosis in a diverse array of tumor types. Phase 1/2 trials in multiple myeloma (MM) have indicated clinical activity of vorinostat, as both a single agent and in combination with bortezomib (BTZ) and immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs). Materials and methods: The present study (MK-0683 PN095) was an open-label, single-arm phase 2b trial of VOR plus BTZ in BTZ-refractory patients (defined as < 25% response on therapy, or progression during or < 60 days after completion of therapy) and patients considered to be refractory, intolerant, or ineligible for IMiD-based therapy regimens. Eligible patients were aged ≥ 18 years, had measurable secretory MM, had received ≥ 2 prior anti-myeloma regimens, and relapsed or progressed following prior systemic therapy. Patients received 21-day cycles of BTZ (1.3 mg/m2 intravenously [IV]; days 1, 4, 8, and 11) plus oral VOR 400 mg/d on days 1 to 14. If patient had no change as the best response after 4 cycles of treatment or progressive disease after 2 cycles of treatment, oral dexamethasone 20 mg on the day of and day after each dose of BTZ could be added to the treatment regimen. Patients were treated until disease progression, unacceptable toxicities, or withdrawal from the study. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR; ≥ partial response). Secondary and exploratory endpoints included clinical benefit response (ORR + minimal response), overall survival (OS), time to progression (TTP), progression-free survival (PFS), and safety. Responses and progression were determined according to the International Myeloma Working Group criteria and the European Bone and Marrow Transplantation Group criteria. All efficacy data will be confirmed by an Independent Adjudication Committee. Results: Between January 2009 and October 2010, 143 patients were enrolled from 41 centers in 12 countries across Asia-Pacific, Europe, and North America. Median duration of MM for the entire study population was 4.6 years, including 31% whose disease had progressed on or within 60 days of last therapy and 66% whose disease had achieved < 25% response to the regimen immediately preceding study entry. The study population was heavily pretreated, having received a median of 4 prior lines of therapy (range 2–17, ≥ 4 prior regimens: 69%). Prior anti-myeloma agents included 100% BTZ (median 2 prior regimens containing BTZ), 100% IMiDs (thalidomide [85%], lenalidomide [71%], or pomalidomide [4%]), and 74% stem cell transplant. As of July 2011, 142 of the enrolled patients received study medication, with a median exposure of 4 cycles (mean 6.2 cycles; range 1–26 cycles). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events regardless of relationship to study drug were predominantly hematologic and gastrointestinal disorders. Of interest, peripheral neuropathy was infrequent and grade ≥ 3 PN occurred in 2 patients (1.6%). The final efficacy evaluation of the IAC will occur in September 2011. Conclusions: Final data for all primary and secondary endpoints, including response assessment and time-to-event data for PFS/TTP, OS, and duration of response will be available at the annual ASH meeting. Disclosures: Siegel: Millenium: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Merck: Honoraria. Off Label Use: Vorinostat, an inhibitor of histone deacetylase, is approved in the US for the treatment of cutaneous manifestations in patients with cutaneous T cell lymphoma (CTCL) who have progressive, persistent or recurrent disease on or following two systemic therapies. Vorinostat is currently under investigation for the treatment of relapsed malignant pleural mesothelioma, relapsed/refractory B cell lymphoma (in combination with other chemotherapy agents), and relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (in combination with bortezomib and other chemotherapy agents). Dimopoulos:Celgene, Ortho-Biotech: Consultancy, Honoraria. Yoon:NK Bio: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy. Kaufman:Merck; Celgene: Research Funding; Millenium; Onxy; Novartis; Keryx: Consultancy. Goldschmidt:Amgen, Novartis, Chugai: Research Funding; Janssen-Cilag, Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Reece:Merck: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Otsuka: Honoraria, Research Funding. Leleu:Janssen Cilag, Celgene, Novartis-Amgen, Leo Pharma, Chugai, Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding. Cavo:Millennium: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Jagannath:Merck: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Graef:Merck: Employment. Houp:Merck: Employment. Sun:Merck & Co., Inc.: Employment. Howe:Merck: Employment. Anderson:Celgene: Consultancy; Millennium: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy; Acetylon: .

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,270
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,631

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,047
Tête enseignante GPT0,325
Écart entre enseignants0,278 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations45
Publié2011
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetMultiple Myeloma Research and TreatmentsTravaux en français237 207